This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Whisper problem: PoW too low to compete with other messages (and potential source of error) #7144
Labels
F2-bug 🐞
The client fails to follow expected behavior.
M4-core ⛓
Core client code / Rust.
P5-sometimesoon 🌲
Issue is worth doing soon.
Milestone
Comments
5chdn
added
M4-core ⛓
Core client code / Rust.
Z1-question 🙋♀️
Issue is a question. Closer should answer.
labels
Nov 27, 2017
yrashk
added a commit
to poanetwork/parity-ethereum
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2018
The error is "PoW too low to compete with other messages" This has been previously reported in openethereum#7144 Solution: prevent the move semantics The source of the error is in PoolHandle.relay implementation for NetPoolHandle. Because of the move semantics, `res` variable is in fact copied (as it implements Copy) into the closure and for that reason, the returned result is always `false.
@zot I think your assessment is spot on. The reason |
tomusdrw
added
F2-bug 🐞
The client fails to follow expected behavior.
and removed
Z1-question 🙋♀️
Issue is a question. Closer should answer.
labels
Jan 2, 2018
Closed
Really it's just an RPC error if the messages actually did get posted to the network. But nice catch and fix regardless! |
debris
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2018
The error is "PoW too low to compete with other messages" This has been previously reported in #7144 Solution: prevent the move semantics The source of the error is in PoolHandle.relay implementation for NetPoolHandle. Because of the move semantics, `res` variable is in fact copied (as it implements Copy) into the closure and for that reason, the returned result is always `false.
debris
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2018
The error is "PoW too low to compete with other messages" This has been previously reported in #7144 Solution: prevent the move semantics The source of the error is in PoolHandle.relay implementation for NetPoolHandle. Because of the move semantics, `res` variable is in fact copied (as it implements Copy) into the closure and for that reason, the returned result is always `false.
5chdn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2018
* Merge pull request #7368 from paritytech/td-future-blocks Wait for future blocks in AuRa * Fix tracing failed calls. * Problem: sending any Whisper message fails The error is "PoW too low to compete with other messages" This has been previously reported in #7144 Solution: prevent the move semantics The source of the error is in PoolHandle.relay implementation for NetPoolHandle. Because of the move semantics, `res` variable is in fact copied (as it implements Copy) into the closure and for that reason, the returned result is always `false. * Merge pull request #7433 from paritytech/td-strict-config Strict config parsing * Problem: AuRa's unsafeties around step duration (#7282) Firstly, `Step.duration_remaining` casts it to u32, unnecesarily limiting it to 2^32. While theoretically this is "good enough" (at 3 seconds steps it provides room for a little over 400 years), it is still a lossy way to calculate the remaining time until the next step. Secondly, step duration might be zero, triggering division by zero in `Step.calibrate` Solution: rework the code around the fact that duration is typically in single digits and never grows, hence, it can be represented by a much narrower range (u16) and this highlights the fact that multiplying u64 by u16 will only result in an overflow in even further future, at which point we should panic informatively (if anybody's still around) Similarly, panic when it is detected that incrementing the step counter wrapped around on the overflow of usize. As for the division by zero, prevent it by making zero an invalid value for step duration. This will make AuRa log the constraint mismatch and panic (after all, what purpose would zero step duration serve? it makes no sense within the definition of the protocol, as finality can only be achieved as per the specification if messages are received within the step duration, which would violate the speed of light and other physical laws in this case). * Merge pull request #7437 from paritytech/a5-chains-expanse Remove expanse chain * Expanse Byzantium update w/ correct metropolis difficulty increment divisor (#7463) * Byzantium Update for Expanse Here the changes go. Hope I didnt miss anything. * expip2 changes - update duration limit * Fix missing EXPIP-2 fields * Format numbers as hex * Fix compilation errors * Group expanse chain spec fields together * Set metropolisDifficultyIncrementDivisor for Expanse * Revert #7437 * Add Expanse block 900_000 hash checkpoint * Advance AuRa step as far as we can and prevent invalid blocks. (#7451) * Advance AuRa step as far as we can. * Wait for future blocks. * fixed panic when io is not available for export block, closes #7486 (#7495) * Update Parity Mainnet Bootnodes (#7476) * Update Parity Mainnet Bootnodes * Replace the Azure HDD bootnodes with the new ones :) * Use https connection (#7503) Use https when connecting to etherscan.io API for price-info * Expose default gas price percentile configuration in CLI (#7497) * Expose gas price percentile. * Fix light eth_call. * fix gas_price in light client
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
F2-bug 🐞
The client fails to follow expected behavior.
M4-core ⛓
Core client code / Rust.
P5-sometimesoon 🌲
Issue is worth doing soon.
I'm running parity 1.8.3 on Linux, testing with both an installed release and a release built from source on a dev network. My Dapp is using web3.js 1.0.0-beta.18.
When I post a whisper message, I always get the error: "PoW too low to compete with other messages". I'm using using priority 10000 and ttl 100 (I've tested with many variations).
I added some debug logs and got an inconsistent result which I think may be linked to the problem.
Whisper::post()
will returnErr(whisper_error("PoW too low to compete with other messages"))
ifrelay()
returnsfalse
.Relay
is bound toPoolHandle::relay()
in whisper.rs, line 51 but relay seems to be behaving oddly, based on some debug logs I put in. Here is the change I made:This produces the following log messages:
The
with_proto_context block()
setsres
totrue
but outside of the block,res
is stillfalse
. This returnsfalse
toWhisper::post()
and, I believe, results in the (wrongly reported) error.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: