Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[PRE REVIEW]: verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia #5764

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 36 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia #5764

editorialbot opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 36 comments
Assignees
@Nikoleta-v3 @EugeneHao @jamesmbaazam
Labels
pre-review R TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Aug 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Submitting author: @thegargiulian (Maria Gargiulo)
Repository: https://github.com/HRDAG/verdata
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission
Version: v0.9
Editor: @Nikoleta-v3
Reviewers: @EugeneHao, @jamesmbaazam
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4e966f5983888e45db2f27a1c9971d8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4e966f5983888e45db2f27a1c9971d8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4e966f5983888e45db2f27a1c9971d8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4e966f5983888e45db2f27a1c9971d8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thegargiulian. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@thegargiulian if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences labels Aug 17, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author 

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.02 s (1492.7 files/s, 184982.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               20            688            661           1548
Markdown                         3             79              0            129
TeX                              2              8              0             86
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            26            776            665           1781
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author 

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1214/18-STS644 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v045.i03 is OK
- 10.1111/biom.12502 is OK
- 10.1198/108571101750524670 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100641 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1168

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Failed to discover a valid open source license

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@Nikoleta-v3 do you have capacity for this? 😊

@thegargiulian
Copy link

Hi @oliviaguest—thanks for being so quick to start the pre-review on this submission! If you're looking for another reviewer, I'd like to suggest hanneoberman.

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

oliviaguest commented Aug 18, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I am looking for an editor, right now. But thank you! 😄

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

Hey 👋🏻 sorry for the late response!

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @Nikoleta-v3 is now the editor

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

Hi @oliviaguest—thanks for being so quick to start the pre-review on this submission! If you're looking for another reviewer, I'd like to suggest hanneoberman.

👋🏻 Hey @thegargiulian, thanks again for your submission! Can you please check out this page: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/lookup and suggest a few more reviewers? 😄

@thegargiulian
Copy link

Hi @Nikoleta-v3!

A couple of reviewer suggestions consolidated into one place:

  • hanneoberman
  • EugeneHao
  • josiahparry
  • seabbs
  • bcjaeger

Thanks and let me know if you need anything else from my end!

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

👋🏻 @hanneoberman, @EugeneHao, @JosiahParry, @seabbs would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙

Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

@JosiahParry
Copy link

I cannot review this week but I can make time for this next week. Will that be okay?

@EugeneHao
Copy link

EugeneHao commented Aug 29, 2023 via email

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

Hey @JosiahParry 👋🏻 Thank you for your response. Sure! I need to find a second reviewer before starting the reviewing process too. 😄

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

Thank you for your response @EugeneHao 🙏🏻

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

👋🏻 @bcjaeger @jamesmbaazam @y1my1 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙

Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

@jamesmbaazam
Copy link

@Nikoleta-v3 Yes, I am happy to review. What are the timelines/deadlines?

@y1my1
Copy link

y1my1 commented Sep 11, 2023

@Nikoleta-v3 Hi, I am also happy to review if it's still needed. However, I am not familiar with the language this package is using.

@bcjaeger
Copy link

@Nikoleta-v3 Hello! The verdata R package looks very interesting. If needed, I'd be happy to review and can start on September 25.

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

Thank you all for your responses! @jamesmbaazam we aim for reviews to be completed within about 2-4 weeks. If that's okay with you then I can go ahead and assign you as a reviewer 😄

@jamesmbaazam
Copy link

Yes, that's fine. Thank you.

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

"Thank you, @y1my1 and @bcjaeger, for your responses! 🙏🏻 I'll assign another reviewer for now, but hopefully, I'll bother you again for a different submission in the future 👀 😆

Have a lovely rest of the week 😄

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

@editorialbot add @EugeneHao as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@EugeneHao added to the reviewers list!

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

@editorialbot add @jamesmbaazam as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

@editorialbot add @jamesmbaazam as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jamesmbaazam added to the reviewers list!

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #5844.

@thegargiulian thegargiulian mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2023
Closed
@hanneoberman
Copy link

👋🏻 @hanneoberman, @EugeneHao, @JosiahParry, @seabbs would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙

Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

Sorry for not responding sooner! I haven't been available, but I'd like to review other R packages in the future.

@Nikoleta-v3
Copy link

Thank you for your reply, @hanneoberman! Amazing, I'll make sure to ping you next time I am handling an R submission 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Nikoleta-v3 Nikoleta-v3

@EugeneHao EugeneHao

@jamesmbaazam jamesmbaazam

Labels
pre-review R TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
10 participants
@y1my1 @oliviaguest @bcjaeger @JosiahParry @thegargiulian @Nikoleta-v3 @EugeneHao @hanneoberman @jamesmbaazam @editorialbot