-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: MPI-Rockstar: a Hybrid MPI and OpenMP Parallel Implementation of the Rockstar Halo finder #7629
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: CosmicProfiles: A Python package for radial profiling of finitely sampled dark matter halos and galaxies Nyx: A Massively Parallel AMR Code for Computational Cosmology MARTINI: Mock Array Radio Telescope Interferometry of the Neutral ISM MAESTROeX: A Massively Parallel Low Mach Number Astrophysical Solver Paicos: A Python package for analysis of (cosmological) simulations performed with Arepo |
Hi @Tomoaki-Ishiyama, and thanks for your submission to JOSS. The nature of this submission looks a bit unusual so I'd like to clear up a few things before we consider continuing to review. Specifically, is the idea that JOSS reviews the submitted repo and the original Rockstar code? Or is this submission in effect a standalone fork that extends the previous code? The latter is in principle in scope for JOSS (see Should I write my own software or contribute to an existing package?) but I notice that the new documentation is just the top-level README, which has some technical details but little context, and there don't appear to be any examples ready to run out-of-the-box. You might find inspiration for the kind of documentation and examples we strive for by glancing at some of the similar articles listed in the comment above. |
Submitting author: @Tomoaki-Ishiyama (Tomoaki Ishiyama)
Repository: https://github.com/Tomoaki-Ishiyama/mpi-rockstar
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Warrick Ball
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Tomoaki-Ishiyama. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Tomoaki-Ishiyama if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: