(test) O3-3361: E2E test that data isn't lost when opening a workspace from another workspace

[chimanwadike]

Requirements

• This PR has a title that briefly describes the work done including the ticket number. If there is a ticket, make sure your PR title includes a conventional commit label. See existing PR titles for inspiration.
• My work conforms to the OpenMRS 3.0 Styleguide and design documentation.
• My work includes tests or is validated by existing tests.

Summary

This PR is an additional test steps in clinical-forms.spec to ensure form inputs are retained when navigating in and out of different workspaces.

Related Issue

https://issues.openmrs.org/browse/O3-3361

[jayasanka-sack]

Thanks for the PR, @chimanwadike! This should be implemented as a new test, as shown in the video provided in the ticket:

https://www.loom.com/share/d4b5f7bf310848e596193386707e8bb9

[chimanwadike]

Thanks @jayasanka-sack
Going by the content of the video, I couldn't find the Clinical Encounter on any instance (both locally and pointing to dev3). However, available forms should be used I guess.

Regarding creating a new test for this. should this be a workspace_spec file or what are your thoughts about the filename, please?
Or a new test in clinical form spec?

Thanks for the PR, @chimanwadike! This should be implemented as a new test, as shown in the video provided in the ticket:

https://www.loom.com/share/d4b5f7bf310848e596193386707e8bb9

[jayasanka-sack]

@brandones would it be okay to use the SOAP notes form for this?

Regarding creating a new test for this. should this be a workspace_spec file or what are your thoughts about the filename, please?

We can use the same spec to have multiple tests.

[brandones]

@jayasanka-sack It doesn't matter to me what note it is, or what the data is. The important thing is that if I enter information on a workspace and then open another workspace from that one, the data I entered in the first workspace isn't lost when I go back to it.

[brandones]

LGTM

[jayasanka-sack]

Thanks for confirming @brandones !

#1886 (comment)

[denniskigen]

This test is failing quite regularly in the CI environment. Can we review it when we get the chance?

[chimanwadike]

Will look into it.
Thanks