-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
roughly added the design #6
Conversation
|
||
```{r} | ||
robincar_glm2 <- function(data, formula, trt, strata, car_scheme, ...) { | ||
fit <- glm(formula = formula, data = data, ...) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for negative binomial we need MASS::glm.nb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the reason to have "unbiased prediction" is that we may encounter cases that the unbiased prediction itself is sufficient and the variance can be ontained from Jackknife/bootstrapping, especially when we want to combine the usage with some multiple imputation methods
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: e957bbb Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Unit Test Performance Difference
Additional test case details
Results for commit 2d780cc ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
merging the design as there is no comments/questions. |
No description provided.