Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roughly added the design #6

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024
Merged

roughly added the design #6

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

clarkliming
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.


```{r}
robincar_glm2 <- function(data, formula, trt, strata, car_scheme, ...) {
fit <- glm(formula = formula, data = data, ...)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for negative binomial we need MASS::glm.nb

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the reason to have "unbiased prediction" is that we may encounter cases that the unbiased prediction itself is sufficient and the variance can be ontained from Jackknife/bootstrapping, especially when we want to combine the usage with some multiple imputation methods

@mbannick mbannick self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
@mbannick mbannick self-requested a review February 20, 2024 23:45
@clarkliming clarkliming marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2024 13:34
Copy link
Contributor

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
----------  -------  ------  -------  ---------
R/hello.R         2       0  100.00%
TOTAL             2       0  100.00%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  -------
R/hello.R       -18      -6  +30.00%
TOTAL           -18      -6  +30.00%

Results for commit: e957bbb

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ $±Tests$ $±Skipped$ $±Failures$ $±Errors$
api 💀 $4.20$ $-4.20$ $-1$ $0$ $0$ $0$
shiny 💀 $3.51$ $-3.51$ $-1$ $0$ $0$ $0$
Additional test case details
Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ Test Case
api 💀 $4.20$ $-4.20$ API_greets_the_person
shiny 💀 $3.51$ $-3.51$ The_Shiny_App_returns_a_proper_greeting

Results for commit 2d780cc

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@clarkliming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

merging the design as there is no comments/questions.

@clarkliming clarkliming merged commit 498ee82 into main Apr 1, 2024
@clarkliming clarkliming deleted the 5_design branch April 1, 2024 00:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants