Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Backport 1.x] [CVE-2020-36518] Move Jackson-databind to 2.13.2 #2562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2022
Merged

[Backport 1.x] [CVE-2020-36518] Move Jackson-databind to 2.13.2 #2562

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2022

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport d43235c from #2548

@peternied @github-actions
Move Jackson-databind to 2.13.2 (#2548)
7118046 
Resolves CVE-2020-36518

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d43235c)
@opensearch-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

✅   Gradle Check success 7118046
Log 3668

Reports 3668

@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli added >upgrade Label used when upgrading library dependencies (e.g., Lucene) dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file backport PRs or issues specific to backporting features or enhancments labels Mar 22, 2022
@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli merged commit 6c85e40 into 1.x Mar 22, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-2548-to-1.x branch March 22, 2022 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli approved these changes

@peternied peternied peternied approved these changes

@dblock dblock Awaiting requested review from dblock dblock is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backport PRs or issues specific to backporting features or enhancments dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file >upgrade Label used when upgrading library dependencies (e.g., Lucene)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@opensearch-ci-bot @peternied @saratvemulapalli