-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lambda processor should retry for certain class of exceptions #5320
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6f32cdc
lambda processor should retry for certain class of exceptions
srikanthjg b2d7d13
Address Comment on complete codec
srikanthjg 2f1d957
Add retryCondidition to lambda Client
srikanthjg 76c1f9c
Address comments
srikanthjg f86437a
Address comments and add UT and IT
srikanthjg b00b92c
Address comment on completeCodec
srikanthjg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions
23
...in/java/org/opensearch/dataprepper/plugins/lambda/common/util/CountingRetryCondition.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
package org.opensearch.dataprepper.plugins.lambda.common.util; | ||
|
||
import software.amazon.awssdk.core.retry.RetryPolicyContext; | ||
|
||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger; | ||
|
||
//Used ONLY for tests | ||
public class CountingRetryCondition extends CustomLambdaRetryCondition { | ||
private final AtomicInteger retryCount = new AtomicInteger(0); | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public boolean shouldRetry(RetryPolicyContext context) { | ||
boolean shouldRetry = super.shouldRetry(context); | ||
if (shouldRetry) { | ||
retryCount.incrementAndGet(); | ||
} | ||
return shouldRetry; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public int getRetryCount() { | ||
return retryCount.get(); | ||
} | ||
} |
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions
17
...ava/org/opensearch/dataprepper/plugins/lambda/common/util/CustomLambdaRetryCondition.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
package org.opensearch.dataprepper.plugins.lambda.common.util; | ||
|
||
import software.amazon.awssdk.core.retry.conditions.RetryCondition; | ||
import software.amazon.awssdk.core.retry.RetryPolicyContext; | ||
|
||
public class CustomLambdaRetryCondition implements RetryCondition { | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public boolean shouldRetry(RetryPolicyContext context) { | ||
Throwable exception = context.exception(); | ||
if (exception != null) { | ||
return LambdaRetryStrategy.isRetryableException(exception); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return false; | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any advantage in moving this to another public method? One disadvantage I see is that the caller needs to know and must follow that he should call
completeCodec
first before he callgetRequestPayload
method - right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i dont think we are allowed to have private methods in interface(Buffer interface). That is the reason for using public here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we want to have it as a separate method instead of keeping this code at where it is?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i felt that complete codec should not be associated with
getRequestPayload
. completeCodec should be independent of request. completeCodec should be done as soon as the buffer is done being added. This is just my thoughts. Please let me know what you think.