[FEATURE]Improve test coverage for HttpJsonConnectorExecutor.java

[TrungBui59]

Description

[Describe what this change achieves]

Issues Resolved

#1381

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.74%. Comparing base (5759bf2) to head (88bd5b4).
Report is 431 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1565      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     79.67%   80.74%   +1.06%     
- Complexity     4020     4182     +162     
============================================
  Files           394      399       +5     
  Lines         16385    16881     +496     
  Branches       1754     1817      +63     
============================================
+ Hits          13055    13630     +575     
+ Misses         2654     2537     -117     
- Partials        676      714      +38     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ml-commons	80.74% <0.00%> (+1.06%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dhrubo-os]

Thanks for raising the PR. DCO is missing (signoff). You can just do : git commit -m "commit message" -s

[dhrubo-os]

Can we try to cover this code section too:

            boolean hasContentTypeHeader = false;
            if (headers != null) {
                for (String key : headers.keySet()) {
                    request.addHeader(key, (String)headers.get(key));
                    if (key.toLowerCase().equals("Content-Type")) {
                        hasContentTypeHeader = true;
                    }
                }
            }

[dhrubo-os]

Looks like difference between invokeRemoteModel_GetMethodSuccessPath & invokeRemoteModel_POSTMethodSuccessPath is only here. May be we can use a function which could be reused to save lines?

[TrungBui59]

@dhrubo-os I just reopen the PR

[mingshl]

@TrungBui59 no file is changed in this PR. Please reopen if needed.