Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Validate Disjuction query in HybridQueryPhaseSearcher #1144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 9799c6c from #1127

* Validate Disjuction query in HybridQueryPhaseSearcher

Signed-off-by: Owais <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 9799c6c)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 14.28571% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.55%. Comparing base (20339b5) to head (efffe6b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on 2.x.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...lsearch/search/query/HybridQueryPhaseSearcher.java 14.28% 10 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #1144      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     81.78%   81.55%   -0.23%     
  Complexity     1244     1244              
============================================
  Files            93       93              
  Lines          4205     4219      +14     
  Branches        710      715       +5     
============================================
+ Hits           3439     3441       +2     
- Misses          498      507       +9     
- Partials        268      271       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vibrantvarun vibrantvarun merged commit dd3172d into 2.x Jan 24, 2025
68 of 71 checks passed
@martin-gaievski martin-gaievski deleted the backport/backport-1127-to-2.x branch January 24, 2025 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants