-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix permissions issues while reading keys in PKCS#1 format #3289
Merged
stephen-crawford
merged 5 commits into
opensearch-project:main
from
cwperks:bc-permissions-pkcs1
Sep 5, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -968,18 +968,26 @@ private SslContext buildSSLServerContext( | |
final ClientAuth authMode | ||
) throws SSLException { | ||
|
||
final SslContextBuilder _sslContextBuilder = configureSSLServerContextBuilder( | ||
SslContextBuilder.forServer(_key, _cert), | ||
sslProvider, | ||
ciphers, | ||
authMode | ||
); | ||
try { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Refactor 'doPrivileged(...) with try catch into a function so you can rewrite this block as the following? final SslContextBuilder _sslContextBuilder = this.doPrivilegedSslAction(() ->
configureSSLServerContextBuilder(SslContextBuilder.forServer(_key, _cert), sslProvider, ciphers, authMode)); |
||
final SslContextBuilder _sslContextBuilder = AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedExceptionAction<SslContextBuilder>() { | ||
@Override | ||
public SslContextBuilder run() throws Exception { | ||
return configureSSLServerContextBuilder(SslContextBuilder.forServer(_key, _cert), sslProvider, ciphers, authMode); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
|
||
if (_trustedCerts != null && _trustedCerts.length > 0) { | ||
_sslContextBuilder.trustManager(_trustedCerts); | ||
} | ||
if (_trustedCerts != null && _trustedCerts.length > 0) { | ||
_sslContextBuilder.trustManager(_trustedCerts); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return buildSSLContext0(_sslContextBuilder); | ||
return buildSSLContext0(_sslContextBuilder); | ||
} catch (final PrivilegedActionException e) { | ||
if (e.getCause() instanceof SSLException) { | ||
throw (SSLException) e.getCause(); | ||
} else { | ||
throw new RuntimeException(e); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private SslContext buildSSLServerContext( | ||
|
@@ -991,19 +999,32 @@ private SslContext buildSSLServerContext( | |
final SslProvider sslProvider, | ||
final ClientAuth authMode | ||
) throws SSLException { | ||
final SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager(); | ||
|
||
final SslContextBuilder _sslContextBuilder = configureSSLServerContextBuilder( | ||
SslContextBuilder.forServer(_cert, _key, pwd), | ||
sslProvider, | ||
ciphers, | ||
authMode | ||
); | ||
|
||
if (_trustedCerts != null) { | ||
_sslContextBuilder.trustManager(_trustedCerts); | ||
if (sm != null) { | ||
sm.checkPermission(new SpecialPermission()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return buildSSLContext0(_sslContextBuilder); | ||
try { | ||
final SslContextBuilder _sslContextBuilder = AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedExceptionAction<SslContextBuilder>() { | ||
@Override | ||
public SslContextBuilder run() throws Exception { | ||
return configureSSLServerContextBuilder(SslContextBuilder.forServer(_cert, _key, pwd), sslProvider, ciphers, authMode); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
|
||
if (_trustedCerts != null) { | ||
_sslContextBuilder.trustManager(_trustedCerts); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return buildSSLContext0(_sslContextBuilder); | ||
} catch (final PrivilegedActionException e) { | ||
if (e.getCause() instanceof SSLException) { | ||
throw (SSLException) e.getCause(); | ||
} else { | ||
throw new RuntimeException(e); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private SslContextBuilder configureSSLServerContextBuilder( | ||
|
@@ -1095,7 +1116,11 @@ public SslContext run() throws Exception { | |
} | ||
}); | ||
} catch (final PrivilegedActionException e) { | ||
throw (SSLException) e.getCause(); | ||
if (e.getCause() instanceof SSLException) { | ||
throw (SSLException) e.getCause(); | ||
} else { | ||
throw new RuntimeException(e); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return sslContext; | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This permission covers read and write for all properties so anything else is redundant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we investigate these other policy lines separately to minimize the surface area of this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only PropertyPermission this code change removes is
permission java.util.PropertyPermission "org.apache.xml.security.ignoreLineBreaks", "write";
, but this explicit permission isn't required since there's already an item forpermission java.util.PropertyPermission "*","read,write";
near the top of this file. I removed another permission that was commented out as well.