-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove ctlplane_vip from undercloud control plane bridge #2651
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove ctlplane_vip from undercloud control plane bridge #2651
Conversation
Thanks for the PR! ❤️ |
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/8fa369cf49ad45428bd9d5d15e1a5623 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 35m 07s |
recheck |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not have the context behind why ctlplane_vip is removed but lgtm as per the commit msg + sanity check (it is not being used anywhere else)
/lgtm
a55dc15
to
b63310a
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/ac480681042f42a59314ed60fffe3817 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 51m 10s |
b63310a
to
c7db1f9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not agree with this change. The undercloud should have two VIPs.
The issue here is conflicting addresses used in openstack-k8s-operators/data-plane-adoption HCI scenarion.
[1] Is the undercloud's VIP on the ctlplane network.
[2] Is the overcloud's VIP on the ctlplane network.
These addresses cannot be the same, the undercloud VIP is hosted on the undercloud node. The overcloud VIP is controlled by pacemaker cluster on the overcloud nodes.
In the uni01alpha scenario in data-plane-adoption you will see that undercloud ctlplane VIP is 192.168.122.101 and overcloud VIP is 192.168.122.99 - to avoid the overlap.
The VIP's on the undercloud is controller by undercloud.conf options:
undercloud_public_host
, undercloud_admin_host
. Looking at [3] it seems these are set to nthhost(122)
and nthhost(123)
- which does not match what we define as VIP in data-plane-adoption scenario.
[1] https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/data-plane-adoption/blob/main/scenarios/hci.yaml#L24
[2] https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/data-plane-adoption/blob/main/scenarios/hci/vips_data.yaml#L20
[3] https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework/blob/6295c4e3f419db89bbccef61eddebecfaaf37161/roles/adoption_osp_deploy/tasks/prepare_undercloud.yml#L137C1-L142C69
No description provided.