test(divider): add ui-test #61
Conversation
WalkthroughA new test suite has been added for the "divider" component in the file Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts (2)
1-3: Consider translating the test suite description to English.The test suite description is currently in Chinese. For consistency and to improve readability for non-Chinese speaking developers, consider translating it to English.
Suggested change:
-test.describe('divider组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('Divider component xdesign specification', () => {
4-11: Approve test case structure with a suggestion for error handling.The test case for 'Basic Usage' is well-structured and follows good practices for UI testing. It correctly navigates to the component, checks for errors, verifies visibility, and captures a screenshot for visual regression testing.
Consider enhancing the error handling by logging the exception details:
- page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) + page.on('pageerror', (exception) => { + console.error('Page error:', exception); + expect(exception).toBeNull(); + })This change will provide more context in case of failures, making debugging easier.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
tests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/basic-usage-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/content-position-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/custom-style-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/direction-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/divider/xdesign.spec.ts (1)
1-36: Overall good test structure with room for improvement.The UI tests for the divider component are well-structured and provide good coverage for visual regression testing. The consistent approach across different test cases is commendable.
To further improve the test suite:
- Implement the suggested refactoring to reduce code duplication.
- Add tests for component behavior and interactivity as previously suggested.
- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each test case and any complex logic.
- Ensure that the test descriptions (currently in Chinese) are consistent with the project's language standards.
These improvements will enhance the maintainability, readability, and comprehensiveness of the test suite.
| test('垂直分割线--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#direction') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#direction') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('direction.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| test('分割线文案位置--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#content-position') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#content-position') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('content-position.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| test('自定义颜色--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#custom-style') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#custom-style') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('custom-style.png') | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor test cases to reduce duplication.
The test cases for 'Vertical Divider', 'Content Position', and 'Custom Color' follow the same structure as the 'Basic Usage' test. While consistency is good, there's significant code duplication that could be reduced to improve maintainability.
Consider refactoring the tests using a helper function:
async function testDividerSection(page, sectionId, screenshotName) {
page.on('pageerror', (exception) => {
console.error('Page error:', exception);
expect(exception).toBeNull();
});
await page.goto(`divider#${sectionId}`);
const demo = page.locator(`#${sectionId}`);
const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo');
await expect(body).toBeInViewport();
await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot(`${screenshotName}.png`);
}
test.describe('Divider component xdesign specification', () => {
test('Basic Usage - UI Screenshot', async ({ page }) => {
await testDividerSection(page, 'basic-usage', 'basic-usage');
});
test('Vertical Divider - UI Screenshot', async ({ page }) => {
await testDividerSection(page, 'direction', 'direction');
});
test('Content Position - UI Screenshot', async ({ page }) => {
await testDividerSection(page, 'content-position', 'content-position');
});
test('Custom Color - UI Screenshot', async ({ page }) => {
await testDividerSection(page, 'custom-style', 'custom-style');
});
});This refactoring reduces code duplication, improves maintainability, and makes it easier to add new test cases in the future.
| import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test' | ||
|
|
||
| test.describe('divider组件xdesign规范', () => { | ||
| test('基本用法--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#basic-usage') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#basic-usage') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('basic-usage.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| test('垂直分割线--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#direction') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#direction') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('direction.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| test('分割线文案位置--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#content-position') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#content-position') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('content-position.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| test('自定义颜色--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#custom-style') | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#custom-style') | ||
| const body = demo.locator('.pc-demo') | ||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('custom-style.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding tests for component behavior and interactivity.
The current tests provide good coverage for visual regression testing of the divider component. However, they don't explicitly test the component's behavior or interactivity.
Consider adding the following types of tests:
- Accessibility tests: Verify that the divider is accessible to screen readers.
- Interaction tests: If the divider has any interactive elements (e.g., collapsible sections), test these interactions.
- Responsive design tests: Verify that the divider behaves correctly on different screen sizes.
Example of an accessibility test:
test('Divider is accessible', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('divider#basic-usage');
const divider = page.locator('.divider-class'); // Replace with actual selector
await expect(await divider.evaluate((el) => el.role)).toBe('separator');
});These additional tests will help ensure the component functions correctly in various scenarios.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit