You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was checking out libpostal, and saw something that could be improved.
My country is
GB
Here's how I'm using libpostal
We're parsing customer-provided addresses to be used by third parties
Here's what I did
We've provided the following address to libpostal: "38 meadow road, garforth, leeds, LS25 2EN"
Here's what I got
Here's what I was expecting
I expected "Garforth" to be correctly identified as a district, instead it's being identified as part of the road name
What's strange is that it does work for other similarly-formatted addresses, e.g.: 24 Slade Lane, Levenshulme, Manchester, M13 0QE correctly identifies "Levenshulme" as a district in "Manchester".
For parsing issues, please answer "yes" or "no" to all that apply.
Do all the toponyms exist in OSM (city, state, region names, etc.)?
Yes
If the address uses a rare/uncommon format, does changing the order of the fields yield the correct result?
N/A
If the address does not contain city, region, etc., does adding those fields to the input improve the result?
N/A
If the address contains apartment/floor/sub-building information or uncommon formatting, does removing that help? Is there any minimum form of the address that gets the right parse?
N/A
Here's what I think could be improved
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
== Parsed results ==
house_number: 38
road: meadow road
suburb: garforth
city: leeds
postcode: ls25 2en
You might want to check out the Senzing provided alternative model. It has
the updated postal codes and such for the UK.
Hi!
I was checking out libpostal, and saw something that could be improved.
My country is
GB
Here's how I'm using libpostal
We're parsing customer-provided addresses to be used by third parties
Here's what I did
We've provided the following address to libpostal:
"38 meadow road, garforth, leeds, LS25 2EN"
Here's what I got
Here's what I was expecting
I expected "Garforth" to be correctly identified as a district, instead it's being identified as part of the road name
What's strange is that it does work for other similarly-formatted addresses, e.g.:
24 Slade Lane, Levenshulme, Manchester, M13 0QE
correctly identifies "Levenshulme" as a district in "Manchester".For parsing issues, please answer "yes" or "no" to all that apply.
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
Here's what I think could be improved
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: