Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

raffaelespazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks submitting your Operator. Please check below list before you create your Pull Request.

New Submissions

Updates to existing Operators

  • Is your new CSV pointing to the previous version with the replaces property?

not sure what this means, where can I find more info

  • Is your new CSV referenced in the appropriate channel defined in the package.yaml ?
  • Have you tested an update to your Operator when deployed via OLM?
    no, how do I do that?

Your submission should not

  • Modify more than one operator
  • Submit operators to both upstream-community-operators and community-operators at once
  • Modify any files outside the above mentioned folders
  • Contain more than one commit. Please squash your commits.

Operator Description must contain (in order)

  1. Description about the managed Application and where to find more information
  2. Features and capabilities of your Operator and how to use it
  3. Any manual steps about potential pre-requisites for using your Operator

Operator Metadata should contain

  • Human readable name and 1-liner description about your Operator
  • Valid category name1
  • One of the pre-defined capability levels2
  • Links to the maintainer, source code and documentation
  • Example templates for all Custom Resource Definitions intended to be used
  • A quadratic logo

Remember that you can preview your CSV here.

--

1 If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file a PR against this repo and explain your need

2 For more information see here

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @raffaelespazzoli. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a operator-framework or openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 27, 2019
@dmesser dmesser self-assigned this Jul 29, 2019
@dmesser
Copy link
Collaborator

dmesser commented Jul 31, 2019

@raffaelespazzoli do you know why scorecard is failing?

@aneeshkp
Copy link
Contributor

@raffaelespazzoli alm-examples can't be empty
alm-examples: |
[]

@dmesser
Copy link
Collaborator

dmesser commented Aug 27, 2019

@raffaelespazzoli any update here?

@raffaelespazzoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dmesser apologies, I am trying to figure out a way to automate creating the olm PR when I cut a new release of the operator. Any example there would help.

@raffaelespazzoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

I created a new PR

@raffaelespazzoli raffaelespazzoli deleted the cert-utils-operator-fix15 branch August 29, 2019 02:08
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants