Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

astar function #6878

Closed
4 tasks
ghost opened this issue Nov 3, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks

astar function #6878

ghost opened this issue Nov 3, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 3, 2016

OrientDB Version, operating system, or hardware.

  • v2.0 SNAPSHOT[ ] - .18[ ] .17[ ] .16[ ] .15[ ] .14[ ] .13[ ] .12[ ] .11[ ] .10[ ] .9[ ] .8[ ] .7[ ] .6[ ] .5[ ] .4[ ] .3[ ] .2[ ] .1[ ] .0[ ]
  • v2.1 SNAPSHOT[ ] - .16[ ] .15[ ] .14[ ] .13[ ] .12[ ] .11[ ] .10[ ] .9[ ] .8[ ] .7[ ] .6[ ] .5[ ] .4[ ] .3[ ] .2[ ] .1[ ] .0[ ]
  • v2.2 SNAPSHOT[ 12] - .rc1[ ] .beta2[ ] .beta1[ ]

Operating System

  • [x ] Linux
  • MacOSX
  • Windows
  • Other Unix
  • Other, name?

Expected behavior and actual behavior

SELECT astar(#38:2159,#36:185, 'Score') FROM V
Error: com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandSQLParsingException: No function with name 'astar', available names are : [date,encod...

Steps to reproduce the problem

SELECT astar(#source,#dest 'xxx') FROM V

@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Member

Mmm... it's quite strange, I think astar function is not properly configured in the function factory.
It should be an easy fix, I'll keep you posted

Thanks

Luigi

@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Member

Hi @austx

I just pushed a fix on 2.2.x branch. The fix will be released with 2.2.13

Thanks

Luigi

luigidellaquila added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2016
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 14, 2016

2.2.13-SNAPSHOT.

astar() never returns.

@lvca lvca reopened this Nov 14, 2016
@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Member

It's related to #6911
I'll work on this asap, but my feeling is that it's just a long running execution because of supernodes.
I'll keep you posted

Thanks

Luigi

@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Member

Fixed in 2.2.14, closing

Thanks

Luigi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants