Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace IsGapObj with our own is_gapobj #141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2018

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Currently, IsGapObj stands out from the GAP headers as an
ugly hack. I'd rather remove it from GAP, and have us be self-contained.

Currently, `IsGapObj` stands out from the GAP headers as an
ugly hack. I'd rather remove it from GAP, and have us be self-contained.
@fingolfin fingolfin requested a review from sebasguts November 7, 2018 12:32
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #141 into master will increase coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #141     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   55.89%   55.99%   +0.1%     
=========================================
  Files          44       44             
  Lines        2605     2611      +6     
=========================================
+ Hits         1456     1462      +6     
  Misses       1149     1149
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
JuliaInterface/src/JuliaInterface.c 95.67% <100%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
JuliaInterface/src/convert.c 90.9% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@sebasguts sebasguts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good :)

@sebasguts sebasguts merged commit e1cadb8 into oscar-system:master Nov 7, 2018
@fingolfin fingolfin deleted the mh/is_gapobj branch November 7, 2018 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants