-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added generic IsJuliaWrapper #158
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #158 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.09% 72.03% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 43 43
Lines 2297 2310 +13
==========================================
+ Hits 1656 1664 +8
- Misses 641 646 +5
|
@fingolfin @ThomasBreuer Should we merge this? |
I would like to change JuliaExperimental to use this new feature, |
Give me some minutes to fix that, please. |
@ThomasBreuer On second thought, this is not super easy to fix atm, because we need to disable the automatic conversion for functions for this to work (i.e., we need to call I suggest we try to merge #160 today, and then this PR. |
@sebasguts Fine with me. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just some minor remarks. Overall, I like this PR (perhaps not surprising, given that I suggested it ;-)
e955794
to
271606d
Compare
I rebased the PR and adressed the comments. |
@fingolfin I think I have adressed all your comments |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, still some nitpicks. But overall it's looking pretty good now to me, thank!
6229d9a
to
cd5349d
Compare
4a3400d
to
37523a3
Compare
which can be used to wrap a Julia object and still be able to call it on Julia functions
37523a3
to
55be249
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests now pass. @sebasguts perhaps you want to check that you are OK with the minor changes I made, then we can merge it.
@fingolfin Yep, I am fine with the changes, thank you :) |
which can be used to wrap a Julia object and still be able to
call it on Julia functions