Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Base.big(obj::GapObj) #763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #763 (5b46ec8) into master (488f71c) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #763      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.15%   78.12%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        3644     3639       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         2848     2843       -5     
  Misses        796      796              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/constructors.jl 98.70% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member Author

One concern is that this formally breaks the ABI, so it should go into 0.8.0.

@@ -2,6 +2,10 @@

## Version 0.7.3-DEV (released 2021-XYZ)

- Remove `Base.big(obj::GapObj)`: nothing was using it and it does not really
fit conceptually into this package.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This depends on what GAP.jl means. If it is a service package for Oscar then big is not interesting, if it is a low level interface between GAP and Julia then the situation is perhaps different.
(I am not arguing against removing the big method.)

@fingolfin fingolfin mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2022
@fingolfin fingolfin merged commit 33cc566 into oscar-system:master Mar 1, 2022
@fingolfin fingolfin deleted the mh/big branch March 1, 2022 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants