Docs: added resource flag to bibtool command #4457
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4457 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.42% 84.41% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 668 668
Lines 88363 88439 +76
==========================================
+ Hits 74600 74656 +56
- Misses 13763 13783 +20 |
fingolfin
reviewed
Jan 13, 2025
YueRen
force-pushed
the
yr/docsBibtool
branch
from
2f823f3 to
d02ad17
Compare
YueRen
force-pushed
the
yr/docsBibtool
branch
from
d02ad17 to
3630878
Compare
lgoettgens
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2025
fingolfin
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I believe there is a bug in
bibtool v2.68. It is supposed to prioritize the.bibtoolrscin the folder it is run in, however on my system it prioritizes the.bibtoolrscin my home folder. You can verify it as follows:~/.bibtoolrscbibtool docs/oscar_references.bib -o docs/oscar_references.bibas per the current instructionsdocs/oscar_references.bibThe change in the pull request should force
bibtoolto use the.bibtoolsrcin the main folder of Oscar.edit, small correction:
bibtoolprioritizing.bibtoolrscin the home folder over the.bibtoolrscin the current folder is actually intended behavior. I think we should change the command in the docu nonetheless just to be safe.