-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: exempt UnrestrictedPoolCreatorWhitelist
addresses from pool creation fee
#8609
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes primarily enhance the functionality and readability of the codebase by introducing new methods for managing whitelisted addresses and refining the pool creation process. Key updates include the addition of methods for checking whitelist status during pool creation and a clearer separation of funding logic. The Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (7)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Additional comments not posted (8)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/poolmanager/export_test.go (1)
154-156
: MethodfundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted
Not FoundThe method
fundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted
does not appear to be implemented in the codebase under the expected name. Please verify if this method is implemented under a different name or if the functionality is covered elsewhere. If it is missing, consider implementing the required logic to check the whitelist status and handle community pool funding.
Analysis chain
Ensure correct implementation of internal logic.
The method
FundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted
delegates tofundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted
. Verify that the internal method correctly checks the whitelist status and handles community pool funding.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `fundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted` method. # Test: Search for the `fundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted` method implementation. Expect: Proper logic for whitelist checking and community pool funding. rg --type go 'func (k Keeper) fundCommunityPoolIfNotWhitelisted'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any method in the Keeper struct that might be related to community pool funding or whitelisting. rg --type go 'func (k Keeper) ' -A 5 # Search for any usage of the term "whitelist" in the codebase to find related logic. rg --type go 'whitelist'Length of output: 23216
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
UnrestrictedPoolCreatorWhitelist
addresses from pool creation fee
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
Closes: #7337
What is the purpose of the change
Exempts
UnrestrictedPoolCreatorWhitelist
addresses from paying the pool creation fee.Testing and Verifying
gotest added
Documentation and Release Note
Unreleased
section ofCHANGELOG.md
?Where is the change documented?
x/{module}/README.md
)