Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debug lines found in EDTA.pl #2

Closed
hsiaopei opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Debug lines found in EDTA.pl #2

hsiaopei opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@hsiaopei
Copy link

hsiaopei commented Jun 4, 2019

We tried to run the pipeline using our genome assembly fasta file, xxx.fa. Unfortunately,
the error message showed up "xxx.fa.masked does not contain any sequences!"
What's going on?
Apparently, at line 48 of the code of EDTA.pl , "if (0){", should be changed to "if (1){".

@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

oushujun commented Jun 4, 2019

Hi @hsiaopei ,

Thanks for testing EDTA! Currently we encounter some issues with TIR-Learner, so the first module EDTA_raw.pl, as well as the EDTA.pl, are under a test mode. I am working with @weijiaweijia, the author of TIR-Learner and co-author of the EDTA manuscript, to resolve this issue. It should be fixed within this week. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best,
Shujun

@oushujun oushujun changed the title Failed to run Debug lines found in EDTA.pl Jun 4, 2019
@oushujun oushujun added bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists labels Jun 4, 2019
@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

Dear @hsiaopei, @gabyrech, and @philippbayer,

Thank you for using EDTA. I just finished a major upgrade for the program including fixing the TIR-Learner issue. Please reinstall the EDTA package and help to test with your genomes. Please ignore the FASTA-Reader error (e.g. FASTA-Reader: Ignoring invalid residues at position(s): On line 252: 520-746) and cp rm errors for now. They are harmless to the result.

Please kindly let me know if you encounter any other errors. Thank you!

Best,
Shujun

@oushujun oushujun mentioned this issue Jun 17, 2019
@philippbayer
Copy link

Thanks for the heads-up Shujun - I just pulled it and turned it on, it's currently running and will probably run for a few days (plant genome) :)

@philippbayer
Copy link

I've now have had it running for about 24 hours:

perl EDTA/EDTA.pl -genome ragoo.fasta -threads 15

currently it's hanging at this step:

perl <snip>/EDTA/bin/LTR_retriever/bin/LTR.identifier.pl ragoo.fasta -list ragoo.fasta.retriever.scn -seq ragoo.fasta.retriever.scn.extend.fa -anno ragoo.fasta.retriever.scn.extend.fa.aa.anno -flanksim 60 -flankmiss 25 -flankaln 0.6 -minlen 100 -u 1.3e-8 -threads 15 -blastplus /ws/00089503/anaconda/envs/EDTA/bin/ -motif TCCA TGCT TACA TACT TGGA TATA TGTA TGCA > ragoo.fasta.defalse

and is not consuming memory or CPU, and it hasn't written output in about 12 hours. The last file written was ragoo.fasta.defalse (my input is ragoo.fasta). Have you observed this before?

Last output in ragoo.fasta.defalse:

Chr0_RaGOO:14387060..14401218   false   motif:TGAA      TSD:TCAG        14387056..14387059      14401219..14401222      IN:14387558..14400719   0.9779  ?       unknown NA      862315
        Adjust: NO      lLTR: 498       rLTR: 499
        Alignment regions: 1, 498, 13661, 14158
        LTR coordinates: 14387060, 14387557, 14400720, 14401218
        TSD-LTR overlap: 0
        Boundary missing: 0

@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

oushujun commented Jun 20, 2019 via email

@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

oushujun commented Aug 1, 2019

Dear All,

Sorry for the delay of response. I just push a bulk update to EDTA and have tested it in different servers - it seems to work now. But I have not tested it in macOS, so some tiny differences could cause problems.

For testing purposes, please use a small file, ie. 20 Mb, for faster turn around. Please let me know if there are any issues.

Best,
Shujun

@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

I consider this issue is fixed. Please reopen it if the problem is persistent, or open new issues if you found new problems.

Best,
Shujun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants