feat: Add some jest-extended matchers to bun test

[nithinkjoy-tech]

What does this PR do?

Add toContainEntry toContainEntries toContainAllEntries toContainAnyEntries from #1825

• Documentation or TypeScript types (it's okay to leave the rest blank in this case)
• Code changes

How did you verify your code works?

• Wrote automated test cases
• I included a test for the new code
• I wrote TypeScript/JavaScript tests and they pass locally (bun-debug test jest-extended.test.js)

[nithinkjoy-tech]

@Jarred-Sumner Code updated, ready for review. Thanks

[dylan-conway]

Suggested change

	const key = expected.getIndex(globalObject, 0);
	const key = expected.getIndex(globalObject, 0);
	if (globalObject.hasException()) return .zero;

Each getIndex call will need to check for exceptions. It's possible for the array to throw

var obj = { a: 1 };
var arr = ["a"];
Object.defineProperty(arr, 1, {
    get: function() {
        throw new Error("error");
    }
    enumerable: true,
}
expect(obj).toContainEntry(arr);

[dylan-conway]

I think the orelse case should set pass = false. Currently this test will pass when it should fail:

expect({}).toContainEntry([ a, 1 ]);

[dylan-conway]

Applies similarly to toContainEntries, toContainAllEntries, and toContainAnyEntries