rococo: update weights

[coderobe]

this is a full run of the rococo weights benchmarks using the same process we use for the other runtimes.
this covers the benchmarks mentioned in paritytech/polkadot-sdk#850

[coderobe]

the full benchmark log is available at https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/polkadot/-/jobs/1475199/raw

[coderobe]

Benchmark failure(s):

2022-04-03 05:12:32 Running Benchmark: runtime_parachains::paras_inherent.enter_bitfields 1/50 1/1    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size.    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size.    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size.    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 Took active validators from set with wrong size    
2022-04-03 05:12:32 panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
  left: `1`,
 right: `101`', /home/gitlab-runner/builds/G3WgZWf2/0/parity/polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/paras_inherent/benchmarking.rs:119:9    
Error: 
   0: �[91mInvalid input: Error executing and verifying runtime benchmark: Execution aborted due to trap: wasm trap: wasm `unreachable` instruction executed
      WASM backtrace:

          0: 0x67a5 - <unknown>!rust_begin_unwind
          1: 0x2f6a - <unknown>!core::panicking::panic_fmt::h8f11323637b4db3b
          2: 0x703e - <unknown>!core::panicking::assert_failed_inner::hb7fa033f7ee539c7
          3: 0x4410e - <unknown>!core::panicking::assert_failed::hf837eae46cefa84c
          4: 0x2fc664 - <unknown>!<rococo_runtime::Runtime as frame_benchmarking::utils::runtime_decl_for_Benchmark::Benchmark<sp_runtime::generic::block::Block<sp_runtime::generic::header::Header<u32,sp_runtime::traits::BlakeTwo256>,sp_runtime::generic::unchecked_extrinsic::UncheckedExtrinsic<sp_runtime::multiaddress::MultiAddress<<<sp_runtime::MultiSignature as sp_runtime::traits::Verify>::Signer as sp_runtime::traits::IdentifyAccount>::AccountId,()>,rococo_runtime::Call,sp_runtime::MultiSignature,(frame_system::extensions::check_non_zero_sender::CheckNonZeroSender<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,frame_system::extensions::check_spec_version::CheckSpecVersion<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,frame_system::extensions::check_tx_version::CheckTxVersion<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,frame_system::extensions::check_genesis::CheckGenesis<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,frame_system::extensions::check_mortality::CheckMortality<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,frame_system::extensions::check_nonce::CheckNonce<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,frame_system::extensions::check_weight::CheckWeight<rococo_runtime::Runtime>,pallet_transaction_payment::ChargeTransactionPayment<rococo_runtime::Runtime>)>>>>::dispatch_benchmark::hbc0648726bb7873a
          5: 0x395cfe - <unknown>!Benchmark_dispatch_benchmark
   0: �[0m

Backtrace omitted. Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display it.
Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full to include source snippets.

/cc @brunopgalvao @shawntabrizi

[brunopgalvao]

Looks like we have to uncomment this line for Rococo.

[coderobe]

that's not too great

[ggwpez]

Okay I will take a look, thanks @coderobe.
As for the failing one: This should be the last failing benchmark across all benchmarks and runtimes.
So we can probably already merge the weights if they are sane and then fix the last one.