Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Output Benchmarks to File #6481

Closed
wants to merge 44 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

shawntabrizi
Copy link
Member

in progress

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. label Jun 23, 2020
Base automatically changed from shawntabrizi-bench-db-tracking to master June 24, 2020 19:03
fn close_early_disapproved(_m: u32, _p: u32, _b: u32, ) -> Weight { 1_000_000_000 }
fn close_early_approved(_m: u32, _p: u32, _b: u32, ) -> Weight { 1_000_000_000 }
fn close_disapproved(_m: u32, _p: u32, _b: u32, ) -> Weight { 1_000_000_000 }
fn close_approved(_m: u32, _p: u32, _b: u32, ) -> Weight { 1_000_000_000 }
Copy link
Contributor

@apopiak apopiak Jul 3, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do wonder whether we should rather default to 0 for these default implementations because that seems like the current default. Either has its drawbacks I guess 🤷

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, its kind of just an opinion. im open to whatever, but my thought is that its better to stick a crazy number than to make it zero.

@shawntabrizi shawntabrizi changed the base branch from master to shawntabrizi-benchmarks-writer July 3, 2020 15:40
Base automatically changed from shawntabrizi-benchmarks-writer to master July 6, 2020 09:34
@shawntabrizi
Copy link
Member Author

superseded by #6567 and #6575

@shawntabrizi shawntabrizi deleted the shawntabrizi-output-benchmarks branch July 9, 2020 06:32
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants