This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
athei
added
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
B3-apinoteworthy
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
labels
Mar 15, 2021
athei
added
the
D3-trivial 🧸
PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
label
Mar 22, 2021
gui1117
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes are good.
But it is a bit unexpect to me to have Schedule
fields not part of the public API of the crate.
5 tasks
athei
added
D2-notlive 💤
PR contains changes in a runtime directory that is not deployed to a chain that requires an audit.
and removed
D3-trivial 🧸
PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
labels
Mar 23, 2021
shawntabrizi
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks fine to me, I prefer your move of all this data to a Config trait, so looking forward to that next.
bot merge |
Trying merge. |
ghost
deleted the
at-contracts-api
branch
March 24, 2021 08:09
hirschenberger
pushed a commit
to hirschenberger/substrate
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2021
* contracts: Remove types and storage from the public interface * contracts: Remove current_schedule() getter * contracts: Improve documentation * Update README.md * Fix integration test
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D2-notlive 💤
PR contains changes in a runtime directory that is not deployed to a chain that requires an audit.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Originally, all storage items and the fields of the
Schedule
data structure were public. This means that every minor change like adding a new contract callable function would require releasing a new major version. This is because every contract callable function requires a new entry in theSchedule
.With this PR users of the crate are required to construct the
Schedule
through itsDefault
implementation. Changes to this default constructedSchedule
can be done by calling associated function on theSchedule
. This allows for changes to theSchedule
without releasing a new major version. When the need arises we will add further functions to theSchedule
or convert it to a builder pattern.The same is true for other storage items. When someone comes forward with a use case for accessing the raw storage of
pallet_contracts
we will consider adding a public function to do so. But by default the data should be private in order to control the public API and prevent churning through major versions.