Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: Incorrect resolution for JAX #2371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

fix: Incorrect resolution for JAX #2371

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

frostming
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2369

Signed-off-by: Frost Ming [email protected]

Pull Request Checklist

  • A news fragment is added in news/ describing what is new.
  • Test cases added for changed code.

Describe what you have changed in this PR.

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files Coverage Δ
src/pdm/models/candidates.py 86.06% <100.00%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
src/pdm/models/repositories.py 73.94% <100.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
src/pdm/resolver/providers.py 92.94% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pdm/formats/requirements.py 77.98% <60.00%> (-0.59%) ⬇️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@frostming frostming merged commit f669ece into main Nov 6, 2023
@frostming frostming deleted the frostming/issue2369 branch November 6, 2023 03:55
@j178 j178 mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect resolution for JAX
1 participant
@frostming