-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: Track MicroPython Edge #906
Open
Gadgetoid
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
ci/micropython-edge
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
from
February 27, 2024 11:19
a4c17e8
to
7ec85c9
Compare
This was referenced Feb 27, 2024
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
from
February 27, 2024 16:44
dfc07b9
to
a21d4d6
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
4 times, most recently
from
March 8, 2024 14:43
edd0565
to
55081a0
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
2 times, most recently
from
March 30, 2024 19:46
66361c7
to
7995480
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 17, 2024 12:28
aa579b0
to
1b59fd4
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 5, 2024 10:21
e152521
to
2146f54
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
3 times, most recently
from
August 13, 2024 09:24
9a705c8
to
9127319
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
from
September 6, 2024 18:18
37cfe8c
to
6cedb56
Compare
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
from
October 2, 2024 12:17
4c32f31
to
f521f5c
Compare
CI tracking the unmerged RP2350 support branch.
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
from
October 25, 2024 14:49
72c5117
to
843db98
Compare
The existing weather example was resulting in `OSError: [Errno 12] ENOMEM` when executing subsequent calls to the open-meteo API.
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/micropython-edge
branch
from
January 15, 2025 17:02
8365574
to
65e7658
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
v1.23.x to v1.24.x
Nothing to see here... yet 👀
Aha! Something to see:
mpconfigvariant_XXX.mk/cmake
file micropython/micropython#15336We may need to update our local board configuration files to adopt this pattern, or perhaps even investigate using variants for boards we ship with multiple memory configuration options.
mp_obj_new_str
to this new method. In many cases we usestd::string
, though, and might want our own similar helper for this common pattern.ADC(n)
instead ofADC(Pin(n))
v1.22.x to v1.23.x
STATIC -> static
A source of incoming pain - micropython/micropython#13763
TLDR: The
STATIC
macro was never really used, is confusing and will be wholly removed. It resolves tostatic
and should be substituted as such.mp_obj_malloc_with_finaliser
There's a breaking change with the introduction of
mp_obj_malloc_with_finaliser
, which replaces callingm_new_obj_with_finaliser
and explicitly settingobj->base.type
.New style added: micropython/micropython@4133c03
Old style removed: micropython/micropython@9716171