Add sig-transaction's reviewers

[ekexium]

Add reviewers from the sig-transaction to the TiDB team: @ekexium, @longfangsong, @you06, which is missing in #522

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• jackysp

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[ekexium]

/cc @tisonkun

[tisonkun]

@ekexium thanks for creating this PR. I'd suggest you create a vote entry under the directory https://github.com/pingcap/community/tree/master/votes and elaborate nominees' contribution (of course, previous sig-transaction's reviewers is enough, but better to have more details on their work yet).

See also the template and https://github.com/tikv/community/pull/139/files#diff-2501407e9d546f432e26d56687cdf445fd1b9798b541cbeeeaee491b00a44fd3

[you06]

We just move the reviewers from tikv/community to here, and we three were promoted as reviewers in that place. Do we need to create vote entry here?

https://github.com/tikv/community/blob/6e036b68e1d9f27b264895512219dd0c0804f68a/sig/transaction/membership.json#L53-L63

[tisonkun]

@you06 actually I call for the migration in #522 multiple times but there is no suggestion on this memberships.

It's ok to have some information catch up later but missing the migration window I'd prefer you guys join the team via normal process, i.e., a vote.

As mentioned here tikv/community#142 (comment), we tend to avoid exceptions. And a nomination for reviewers, with approvals, last for 72 hours. It won't take a long time.

[jackysp]

LGTM

[cfzjywxk]

LGTM

[MyonKeminta]

I didn't understand it well. How can I vote? Is an approval to this PR enough?

[ti-chi-bot]

@MyonKeminta: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments.

In response to this:

I didn't understand it well. How can I vote? Is an approval to this PR enough?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[tisonkun]

@MyonKeminta thanks for showing you approval. According the governance rules accepted earlier #522

Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the community repository. Votes are clearly indicated by a pull request adding an entry under votes folder. Votes may contain multiple items for approval and these should be clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the vote pull request. Voting may take three flavors

You can show your approval by GitHub out-of-the-box approval.

For team decisions, only the votes of active team maintainers are binding. Non-binding votes are still useful for those with binding votes to understand the perception of an action in the wider community.

So only @pingcap/tidb-maintainers has binding votes to this decision process. Only binding vote counts.

For promote a new reviewer, we require a minimal length on 3 days so with 2 approval from @jackysp & @cfzjywxk , this votes will be closed as accepted tomorrow if there is no further objections.

[cfzjywxk]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 09fc57e

[tisonkun]

@cfzjywxk I think you should sign CLA for this repo 😂

[tisonkun]

@ekexium @you06 @longfangsong I've added you in the tidb-reviewers team.