Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta,infoschema: fix a bug that after HasTemporaryTable() wrong infoschema v2 full load #54879

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024

Conversation

tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #50959

Problem Summary:

In infoschema v2 full load, we don't read the model.TableInfo for temporary tables, the temporary table is not added.
So after a full load, the HasHasTemporaryTable() returns false even maybe there are some temporary tables.

What changed and how does it work?

Load name => model.TableInfo for temporary tables.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Jul 24, 2024
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao requested a review from wjhuang2016 July 24, 2024 12:36
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 24, 2024
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao requested a review from lance6716 July 24, 2024 12:36
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Hi @tiancaiamao. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update hasSpecialAttributes() too.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.7729%. Comparing base (cf4bb51) to head (ca60a22).
Report is 21 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #54879        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   74.7249%   74.7729%   +0.0479%     
================================================
  Files          1558       1568        +10     
  Lines        363817     452264     +88447     
================================================
+ Hits         271862     338171     +66309     
- Misses        72284      93256     +20972     
- Partials      19671      20837      +1166     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 50.1515% <100.0000%> (?)
unit 71.6425% <100.0000%> (-1.9704%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.9567% <ø> (-2.2327%) ⬇️
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 52.4028% <ø> (+4.6762%) ⬆️

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please update hasSpecialAttributes() too.

Temporary tables do not need to be keep in-memory, there is no background worker loop visiting it.
To handle the HasTemporaryTable() bug, change the load process to load table info for temporary tables is enough.

@wjhuang2016

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao requested a review from wjhuang2016 July 25, 2024 08:47
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Jul 26, 2024

@tiancaiamao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Jul 29, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 29, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716, wjhuang2016

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Jul 29, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 29, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-07-29 02:58:41.135420796 +0000 UTC m=+151837.415468865: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.
  • 2024-07-29 07:28:27.120464928 +0000 UTC m=+168023.400512997: ☑️ agreed by wjhuang2016.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 247b06e into pingcap:master Jul 29, 2024
23 checks passed
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the temp-table branch July 29, 2024 09:21
hawkingrei pushed a commit to hawkingrei/tidb that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants