Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: make chunk.SwapColumn private #57274

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #55885

Problem Summary:
The root cause is in Limit executor, it has an inline projection, but it use chunk.SwapColumn directly to do the projection, which will cause error if the Limit's output contains multiple column that point to same shallow column in input Chunk

What changed and how does it work?

This pr

  1. make chunk.SwapColumn a private method, so it will not be used mistakenly
  2. Rename ColumnEvaluator to ColumnSwapHelper and move it from expression package to chunk package
  3. use ColumnSwapHelper to do the inline projection in Limit executor.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 11, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Hi @windtalker. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
@windtalker windtalker force-pushed the make_SwapColumn_private branch from 29e9ebc to 73234e2 Compare November 11, 2024 07:50
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.07143% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.0260%. Comparing base (e16613d) to head (64d47a1).
Report is 31 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57274        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8878%   74.0260%   +1.1382%     
================================================
  Files          1667       1670         +3     
  Lines        460775     465559      +4784     
================================================
+ Hits         335849     344635      +8786     
+ Misses       104289     100379      -3910     
+ Partials      20637      20545        -92     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 43.7992% <91.0714%> (?)
unit 72.8204% <91.0714%> (+0.5448%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 45.2858% <ø> (+0.2400%) ⬆️

Signed-off-by: xufei <[email protected]>
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit-test

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 11, 2024

@windtalker: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit-test

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@windtalker: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, XuHuaiyu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-11-12 10:14:27.952772144 +0000 UTC m=+351230.143641140: ☑️ agreed by XuHuaiyu.
  • 2024-11-13 03:55:11.885096084 +0000 UTC m=+414874.075965082: ☑️ agreed by AilinKid.

@AilinKid
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Nov 13, 2024
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test fast_test_tiprow

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2024

@windtalker: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test build
  • /test check-dev
  • /test check-dev2
  • /test mysql-test
  • /test pull-br-integration-test
  • /test pull-integration-ddl-test
  • /test pull-lightning-integration-test
  • /test pull-mysql-client-test
  • /test pull-unit-test-ddlv1
  • /test unit-test

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pingcap/tidb/canary_ghpr_unit_test
  • /test pull-common-test
  • /test pull-e2e-test
  • /test pull-integration-common-test
  • /test pull-integration-copr-test
  • /test pull-integration-e2e-test
  • /test pull-integration-jdbc-test
  • /test pull-integration-mysql-test
  • /test pull-integration-nodejs-test
  • /test pull-integration-python-orm-test
  • /test pull-sqllogic-test
  • /test pull-tiflash-test

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_build
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_check
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_check2
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_mysql_test
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_unit_test
  • pingcap/tidb/pull_integration_ddl_test
  • pingcap/tidb/pull_mysql_client_test

In response to this:

/test fast_test_tiprow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 13, 2024

@windtalker: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
fast_test_tiprow 64d47a1 link true /test fast_test_tiprow

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 65281ad into pingcap:master Nov 13, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@windtalker windtalker deleted the make_SwapColumn_private branch November 13, 2024 06:45
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. label Nov 14, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #57368.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. label Nov 14, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #57369.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. label Nov 14, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #57373.

ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
windtalker added a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

index out of range [4] with length 1 in executor.(*LimitExec).Next->chunk.(*Chunk).TruncateTo
4 participants