planner: let exists subquery return signed int type

[windtalker]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #56641

Problem Summary:
The root cause of #56641 is that exists subquery returns unsigned type in TiDB, and it is caused by that
in TiDB
expression.NewOne() and expression.NewZero() both returns unsigned integer type.
And in

tidb/pkg/planner/core/expression_rewriter.go

Lines 1105 to 1109 in 56e7093

	if (row != nil && !v.Not) || (row == nil && v.Not) {
	er.ctxStackAppend(expression.NewOne(), types.EmptyName)
	} else {
	er.ctxStackAppend(expression.NewZero(), types.EmptyName)
	}

It use expression.NewOne() and expression.NewZero() as the result of the exists subquery.

The reason why expression.NewOne() and expression.NewZero() returns unsigned integer type is hard to tell now. The only thing I know is it is introduced in this pr: #21062 . Looks like it is not related to exists subquery.
It may have high regression risk to change the return type of expression.NewOne() and expression.NewZero(), so this pr adds two new function to return signed version on constant one and constant zero.

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @windtalker. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.2274%. Comparing base (e16613d) to head (14b711a).
Report is 29 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57277        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8878%   74.2274%   +1.3396%     
================================================
  Files          1667       1672         +5     
  Lines        460775     468033      +7258     
================================================
+ Hits         335849     347409     +11560     
+ Misses       104289     100173      -4116     
+ Partials      20637      20451       -186     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	44.2342% <100.0000%> (?)
unit	73.1496% <100.0000%> (+0.8739%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	45.6727% <ø> (+0.6269%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, XuHuaiyu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [AilinKid,XuHuaiyu]
• pkg/expression/OWNERS [XuHuaiyu]
• pkg/planner/OWNERS [AilinKid]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-11-12 03:53:43.863470182 +0000 UTC m=+328386.054339174: ☑️ agreed by XuHuaiyu.
• 2024-11-13 07:12:10.419637582 +0000 UTC m=+426692.610506571: ☑️ agreed by AilinKid.

[tiprow]

@windtalker: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
fast_test_tiprow	14b711a	link	true	/test fast_test_tiprow

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[windtalker]

/test check-dev2

[tiprow]

@windtalker: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test check-dev2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #57365.