Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate table scan related code to DAGStorageInterpreter #4783

Merged

Conversation

SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor

@SeaRise SeaRise commented Apr 27, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #4118

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

  • remove DAGQueryBlock used in DAGStorageInterpreter
  • move executeRemoteQuery, executeCastAfterTableScan and executePushedDownFilter from DAGQueryBlockInterpreter to DAGStorageInterpreter

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Apr 27, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • JaySon-Huang
  • ywqzzy

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 27, 2022
@ywqzzy ywqzzy self-requested a review April 27, 2022 10:33
@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Apr 27, 2022

/run-integration-test

@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Apr 27, 2022

/run-integration-test

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang self-requested a review April 27, 2022 11:36
@SeaRise SeaRise requested a review from windtalker April 27, 2022 15:00
@ywqzzy ywqzzy self-requested a review April 29, 2022 03:44
Copy link
Contributor

@ywqzzy ywqzzy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label May 5, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels May 5, 2022
Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <[email protected]>
@JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@JaySon-Huang: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: d3facf8

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label May 5, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@SeaRise: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented May 5, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                         Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAGQueryBlockInterpreter.cpp         285               268     5.96%          39                28    28.21%         656               585    10.82%         214               207     3.27%
DAGQueryBlockInterpreter.h             2                 0   100.00%           2                 0   100.00%           2                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
DAGStorageInterpreter.cpp            420               420     0.00%          32                32     0.00%         861               861     0.00%         282               282     0.00%
InterpreterUtils.cpp                  32                25    21.88%           4                 2    50.00%          47                36    23.40%          24                20    16.67%
PushDownFilter.cpp                    15                15     0.00%           3                 3     0.00%          33                33     0.00%          12                12     0.00%
PushDownFilter.h                       1                 1     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%           0                 0         -
RemoteRequest.cpp                     31                31     0.00%           3                 3     0.00%          80                80     0.00%          22                22     0.00%
RemoteRequest.h                        1                 1     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%           0                 0         -
TiDBTableScan.cpp                     31                31     0.00%           2                 2     0.00%          51                51     0.00%          24                24     0.00%
TiDBTableScan.h                        6                 6     0.00%           6                 6     0.00%          18                18     0.00%           0                 0         -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                824               798     3.16%          93                78    16.13%        1750              1666     4.80%         578               567     1.90%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18076      10153            43.83%    200504  101030       49.61%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit e10c6ed into pingcap:master May 5, 2022
@SeaRise SeaRise deleted the move_table_scan_to_stroage_interpreter branch September 26, 2022 05:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants