Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flaking: integration default value test #4785

Closed
Tracked by #2246
Rustin170506 opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5154
Closed
Tracked by #2246

Flaking: integration default value test #4785

Rustin170506 opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5154
Assignees
Labels
area/ticdc Issues or PRs related to TiCDC. component/test Unit tests and integration tests component. severity/minor type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug.

Comments

@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member

Which jobs are flaking?

integration-test

Which test(s) are flaking?

default_value

Jenkins logs or GitHub Actions link

https://ci2.pingcap.net/blue/organizations/jenkins/cdc_ghpr_integration_test/detail/cdc_ghpr_integration_test/10180/pipeline/

Anything else we need to know

None

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 added component/test Unit tests and integration tests component. area/ticdc Issues or PRs related to TiCDC. labels Mar 7, 2022
@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

In addition, this test is very time consuming and has become a bottleneck in the CI.

@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

another case: https://ci2.pingcap.net/blue/rest/organizations/jenkins/pipelines/cdc_ghpr_integration_test/runs/10586/nodes/146/steps/722/log/?start=0

[2022-03-16T08:57:29.254Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 276-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:31.168Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 277-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:33.060Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 278-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:34.975Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 279-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:36.914Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 280-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:38.851Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 281-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:41.440Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 282-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:43.369Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 283-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:44.943Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 284-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:47.497Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 285-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:49.420Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 286-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:51.352Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 287-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:53.261Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 288-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:55.801Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 289-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:57.701Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 290-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:57:59.606Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 291-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:01.525Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 292-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:03.433Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 293-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:05.364Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 294-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:07.920Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 295-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:09.847Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 296-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:11.779Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 297-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:13.697Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 298-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:15.636Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 299-th check, retry later
[2022-03-16T08:58:17.539Z] table mark.finish_mark_1 not exists for 300-th check, retry later

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 added type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug. severity/minor labels Apr 12, 2022
maxshuang pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2022
…ng time (#5154)

* refactor(test): refine the default-value integration test to save running time

Issue Number: close #4785
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ticdc Issues or PRs related to TiCDC. component/test Unit tests and integration tests component. severity/minor type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants