Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
checker(dm): make
start-task/resume-task/check-task
return pre-check result only warning #4118checker(dm): make
start-task/resume-task/check-task
return pre-check result only warning #4118Changes from 5 commits
e8d865f
cb7d6ef
85a0fd4
d13e6ff
d09ecab
c000cd5
1edde50
0574595
c41787d
fb60433
e16f98d
0c1792a
b64d32a
ce09d4c
a64ef81
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about we always assume there is one result in
pr
, as stated intiflow/dm/dm/unit/unit.go
Lines 44 to 47 in d8dab8d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It can be seen that
checker
is designed according to the unit at the beginning. But it is not in fact(not complete unit interface). And I think we don't plan to treat him as a unit in the future yet. So it is a semi-finished product. This is the reason that it looks a lot unreasonable.I think we can modify these unreasonable places after the end of this feature. Result is also. @Ehco1996
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actully it depends on requirements, i am not sure if we have a plan to merge full-time/sync-time sync_diff in to checker? if so i thinks it's better to treat checker as a unit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so user use openapi to start-task can not see the warnings ?, i thinks we need log theso these warnnings at leaset