Fix : function name for acceleration and deceleration getters

[ameisso]

No description provided.

[pkerspe]

please fix typo in word "deceleration". Then It should be good to merge

[pkerspe]

please fix typo, should be "deceleration"

[pkerspe]

please fix typo, should be "deceleration"

[pkerspe]

please fix typo, should be "deceleration"

[pkerspe]

please fix typo, should be "deceleration"

[ameisso]

Hello,

Thanks for the review
Changes have been made

[pkerspe]

Thanks @ameisso, the typos are fixed, but in commit 8239eb8 you additional changes to the code which are still not fixed according to comment. Also this additional change actually does not match the title of this pull request also. I don't mind so much about the title, but the logic should be changed according to comment to prevent dead code / empty code blocks.
Suggesting something like this:

if (coreNumber == 0)
  {
    disableCore0WDT(); // we have to disable the Watchdog timer to prevent it from rebooting the ESP all the time another option would be to add a vTaskDelay but it would slow down the stepper
}
#if ! (CONFIG_IDF_TARGET_ESP32C3 || CONFIG_IDF_TARGET_ESP32S2)
  else if (coreNumber == 1)
  {
    disableCore1WDT(); // we have to disable the Watchdog timer to prevent it from rebooting the ESP all the time another option would be to add a vTaskDelay but it would slow down the stepper
  }
#endif
  else
  {
    // invalid core number given
    return false;
  }

[pkerspe]

see comment about your newly added code block for wdt disabling

[pkerspe]

In such a case the whole if statement in the previous line would not make sense, since it would result in an empty block.
Please refactor so that we do not have an empty if block at all. Might need to simply exchange the if / else order.
At the end on such MCUs the function should return false if 1 is given as core number

[ameisso]

Hello,

changed the block as you asked .
Thanks for the feedback