Revert sidebar refactoring #41
Conversation
Added a space
WalkthroughMy fellow developers, today we are witnessing a series of incremental improvements to our codebase. We have a version update for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
dist/Vxg.common.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/Vxg.umd.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/Vxg.umd.min.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.min.js
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.json(1 hunks)src/components/BasicHead.vue(2 hunks)src/components/BasicSide.vue(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/BasicSide.vue (2)
246-246: Now, let me commend this formatting improvement.The addition of a space before the parentheses in the tag_alias function enhances readability. This change maintains consistency with the same formatting update in BasicHead.vue.
183-183: My fellow Americans, let me be clear about this menu item filtering change.The addition of
&& item.title !== 'Devices'to the menu item filtering condition appears to be removing the Devices menu item from the navigation. We need to ensure this is the intended behavior as part of the sidebar refactoring revert.Let me propose a script to verify the impact:
✅ Verification successful
My fellow Americans, let me be clear about these device-related changes.
After a thorough investigation of our codebase, I can confirm that the removal of the Devices menu item appears to be intentional. While there is a route check in BasicHead.vue that references devices, the absence of any device-related components or files suggests this is part of a broader effort to remove device functionality from the system.
- The only remaining references are:
- The menu filter we're reviewing in BasicSide.vue
- A route check in BasicHead.vue that may need to be cleaned up in a future update
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any references to the Devices menu item in the codebase # Search for Devices menu item configuration rg -l "title.*Devices" --type vue # Search for routes or components related to Devices rg -l "path.*device" --type vue --type jsLength of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's conduct a more thorough search with correct file extensions # Search for Devices-related content in .vue and .js files echo "=== Searching for Devices menu and title references ===" rg "title.*Devices" -g "*.{vue,js}" echo -e "\n=== Searching for device-related routes and paths ===" rg "path.*device" -g "*.{vue,js}" echo -e "\n=== Looking for any device-related components or imports ===" rg "device" -g "*.{vue,js}" -i # List all potential device-related files echo -e "\n=== Finding device-related filenames ===" fd -e vue -e js -i "device"Length of output: 1099
package.json (1)
4-4: Let me address this package version update, my fellow developers.The version update from 0.16.150-pqview to 0.16.185-pqview represents a significant jump. We must verify this version's existence and security status.
Let's run this verification script:
| @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| function tag_alias(asset) { | |||
| if (null != asset.custom12) { | |||
| return asset.tag + '(' + asset.custom12 + ')' | |||
| return asset.tag + ' (' + asset.custom12 + ')' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
My fellow developers, let me point out a matter of code duplication.
While the formatting changes to add spaces before parentheses are good, I notice that the tag_alias function appears twice in this file. This duplication should be addressed.
Let's consolidate these duplicate functions into a single definition:
-function tag_alias(asset) {
- if (null != asset.custom12) {
- return asset.tag + ' (' + asset.custom12 + ')'
- }
- return asset.tag
-}
// Keep only one instance at the top of the script sectionAlso applies to: 681-681
Summary by CodeRabbit
Package Update
0.16.150-pqviewto0.16.185-pqviewUI Improvements