Try disabling per-file-ignore & ignore warning

[CoMPaTech]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated pyproject.toml configuration for linting tools
  • Removed B320 test from bandit.yaml
  • Added pylint comment to suppress warning in test_init.py

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request involves minor configuration and linting-related changes across three files. The modifications include a typographical correction in pyproject.toml, removal of a specific test in tests/bandit.yaml, and addition of a pylint suppression comment in tests/test_init.py. These changes appear to be focused on improving code quality, configuration management, and addressing linting warnings without altering core functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
pyproject.toml	- Corrected typo in comment from "occurances" to "occurrences" - Commented out pylint_per_file_ignores plugin - Commented out per-file-ignores section
tests/bandit.yaml	- Removed test B320 from the list of tests
tests/test_init.py	- Added # pylint: disable=redefined-outer-name comment to version = None line

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's linting dance, oh so neat!
Typos fixed, configs now complete
Comments added with playful grace
Warnings silenced without a trace
Code polished, clean as can be! 🔍

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1d3723 and dcbeff2.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• pyproject.toml (3 hunks)
• tests/bandit.yaml (0 hunks)
• tests/test_init.py (2 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• tests/bandit.yaml

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• tests/test_init.py

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Check commit

🔇 Additional comments (2)

pyproject.toml (2)

57-57: LGTM! Fixed typo in comment.

Corrected spelling from "occurances" to "occurrences".

---

78-78: Verify the impact of disabling per-file-ignores.

The changes align with the PR objective to disable per-file ignores. However, this might surface previously suppressed lint warnings.

Let's check if this change impacts any existing files:

Also applies to: 369-374

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
100.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b1d3723) to head (dcbeff2).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #694   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           20        20           
  Lines         3449      3449           
=========================================
  Hits          3449      3449           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.