rpma: adopt usage_to_access to support iWARP specificity XXX

[janekmi]

This change is 

[grom72]

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi)

---

src/mr.c, line 70 at r1 (raw file):

usage_to_access(struct rpma_peer *peer, int usage)

usage_to_access(int usage, struct rpma_peer *peer)

BTW
do we need a whole peer here?
in this case, shall we move usage_to_access to peer_usage_to_access?

---

src/peer.c, line 158 at r1 (raw file):

 */
enum ibv_transport_type
rpma_peer_get_transport_type(struct rpma_peer *peer)

inline?

[grom72]

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi)

[janekmi]

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @grom72)

---

src/mr.c, line 70 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, grom72 (Tomasz Gromadzki) wrote…

usage_to_access(struct rpma_peer *peer, int usage)

usage_to_access(int usage, struct rpma_peer *peer)

BTW
do we need a whole peer here?
in this case, shall we move usage_to_access to peer_usage_to_access?

Yes. I like the idea. Moved.

---

src/peer.c, line 158 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, grom72 (Tomasz Gromadzki) wrote…

inline?

Dropped.

[ldorau]

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r2.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @grom72)

[janekmi]

Ref: #1044