Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MPI Sessions Use-case #349

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 26, 2021
Merged

MPI Sessions Use-case #349

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 26, 2021

Conversation

spophale
Copy link
Contributor

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal.

  • You do not need to vote on every proposal
  • If you have no opinion, don't vote - that is also useful data
  • If you've already commented on this issue, please still vote so
    we know your current thoughts
  • Not all proposals solve exactly the same problem, so we may end
    up accepting proposals that appear to have some overlap
    This is not a binding majority-rule vote, but it will be a very
    significant input into the corresponding ASC decision.

Here are the meanings for the emojis:

  • Hooray or Rocket: I support this so strongly that I
    want to be an advocate for it
  • Heart: I think this is an ideal solution
  • Thumbs up: I'd be happy with this solution
  • Confused: I'd rather we not do this, but I can tolerate it
  • Thumbs down: I'd be actively unhappy, and may even consider
    other technologies instead
    If you want to explain in more detail, feel free to add another
    comment, but please also vote on this comment.

@spophale spophale changed the title MPI essions uc MPI Sessions Use-case Apr 14, 2021
@SteVwonder
Copy link
Contributor

PDF copy of the standard as produced by the PR (updated 2021-04-14): pmix-standard.pdf

@jjhursey jjhursey added the RFC Request for Comment label Apr 15, 2021
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

jjhursey commented Apr 15, 2021

Note this PR requires PR #328 (which is up for a second vote in 2Q 2021). As such the first 13 commits to this PR are PR #328 and the 3 newer commits are actually part of this PR.

Once PR #328 is merged we will rebase this PR, and fix the signed-off-by CI checks.

@jjhursey jjhursey added the Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC label Apr 15, 2021
@jjhursey jjhursey added this to the PMIx v5 Standard milestone Apr 15, 2021
@kathrynmohror kathrynmohror added the First Vote Passed ASC first vote passed label May 14, 2021
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

PMIx ASC 2Q 2021

@jjhursey jjhursey force-pushed the MPI_Sessions_UC branch 2 times, most recently from 2c1acf9 to 0681b82 Compare May 20, 2021 14:43
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

jjhursey commented May 20, 2021

Now that PR #328 has been merged I:

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

PMIx ASC 3Q 2021

  • Passed the second vote: 7 yes / 0 no / 2 abstain
  • Will be merged into the master branch targeting PMIx v5.0

@jjhursey jjhursey added the Accepted as Stable ASC second vote passed. Accepted as Stable! label Jul 22, 2021
Pophale and others added 3 commits July 26, 2021 13:45
Signed-off-by: Swaroop Pophale <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Herbein <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Swaroop Pophale <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Herbein <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Swaroop Pophale <[email protected]>
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

I rebased and merged this PR. It'll be in the v5 version of the document.

@jjhursey jjhursey merged commit 81123f8 into pmix:master Jul 26, 2021
@jjhursey jjhursey mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted as Stable ASC second vote passed. Accepted as Stable! Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC First Vote Passed ASC first vote passed RFC Request for Comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants