Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Monomer Docs #255

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Update Monomer Docs #255

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

natebeauregard
Copy link
Collaborator

@natebeauregard natebeauregard commented Oct 17, 2024

Update Monomer docs with monogen generation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new overview document detailing Monomer's role in enhancing interoperability between Cosmos SDK and Ethereum's OP Stack.
    • Added a new HTML guide for integrating wallets with Monomer, covering both L1 and L2 functionalities.
  • Improvements

    • Updated documentation for creating and interacting with Monomer applications, including simplified setup instructions and new commands.
    • Restructured various documentation files for clarity, including updates to the introduction and interaction guides.
    • Enhanced wallet integration instructions, emphasizing the configuration of L1 and L2 wallets.
    • Adjusted sidebar positions for improved navigation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected spelling errors and improved terminology consistency across multiple documents.
  • Documentation

    • Updated sidebar positions and navigation links for improved user experience.
    • Adjusted the configuration for documentation links and language support in the Docusaurus setup.

@natebeauregard natebeauregard marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 17:45
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to various documentation files and JSON configurations related to the Monomer project. Key modifications include restructuring documents to focus on Monomer applications, updating sidebar positions, and enhancing clarity in explanations. Additionally, JSON files for categories have been adjusted to reflect new positions. A new overview document has been introduced, and the Docusaurus configuration has been updated to improve navigation and support for additional languages.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/docs/build/_category_.json Updated "position" from 3 to 4.
docs/docs/build/create-an-app-with-monomer.md Restructured content to focus on Monomer applications, updated title and instructions, simplified bootstrapping steps.
docs/docs/build/interact.md Updated title, adjusted sidebar position, restructured sections on wallet configuration and transaction submissions.
docs/docs/intro.md Changed title, rephrased introduction, removed "At a Glance" section, added "Getting Started" section.
docs/docs/learn/_category_.json Updated "position" from 2 to 3.
docs/docs/learn/blocks.md Updated section headers, corrected spelling, expanded explanations of state and withdrawal processes.
docs/docs/learn/l2-mempool.md Updated sidebar position from 3 to 4, content largely unchanged.
docs/docs/learn/rollup-module.md Changed title format, clarified module functionality and state handling.
docs/docs/learn/withdrawals.md Adjusted sidebar position from 4 to 3, corrected spelling, refined withdrawal process description.
docs/docs/overview.md New document detailing Monomer's role in enhancing interoperability between Cosmos SDK and Ethereum.
docs/docusaurus.config.ts Updated editUrl, removed logo configuration, added new items to navbar, updated Discord link, added language support.
docs/package.json Added dependency "prismjs": "^1.25.0".
monogen/testapp/wallet/index.html New HTML file for Monomer wallet integration, detailing L1 and L2 functionalities.
Makefile Removed wallet-integration target.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update Monomer Docs #255: The changes in this PR directly modify the same JSON structure in docs/docs/build/_category_.json by updating the "position" value, which is identical to the change made in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • NiloCK
  • natebeauregard

🐰 "In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With Monomer's charm, we pave the way.
From builds to wallets, clarity we seek,
In every update, let our knowledge peak!
So gather 'round, dear friends, let's cheer,
For a brighter path in the code we hold dear!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
docs/docs/intro.md (3)

6-12: LGTM: Clear warning and concise introduction.

The warning about Monomer's pre-production status is crucial for users. The introduction provides a clear and concise explanation of Monomer's purpose.

Consider adding a brief mention of the benefits or use cases of Monomer in the introduction to further engage readers. For example:

 Monomer is a compatibility layer allowing Cosmos SDK applications to be deployed as Ethereum rollups on the OP Stack.
+This enables developers to leverage the strengths of both ecosystems, potentially improving scalability and interoperability.

14-20: LGTM: Well-structured "Getting Started" section with a minor suggestion.

The "Getting Started" section provides a clear roadmap for users to navigate the documentation. It effectively guides readers from a high-level overview to specific data flows and then to practical application building.

There's a minor grammatical issue in the first sentence. Consider this change:

-The [Overview](./overview) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its architecture and use cases.
+The [Overview](./overview) section provides a high-level overview of Monomer, explaining its architecture and use cases.

This change adds a hyphen to "high-level" as it's functioning as a compound adjective modifying "overview".

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...verview](./overview) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its arc...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


22-28: LGTM: Valuable community resources with a suggestion for clarity.

The inclusion of community resources is excellent, providing users with channels for support and updates.

Consider adding a brief explanation of the relationship between Nethermind, Polymer Labs, and Monomer to provide context for the separate Twitter links. For example:

 ## Community and support

 Join our community for support, engaging discussions, and updates:

 - [Discord](https://discord.gg/UR5ahaXwHH): Connect in real-time with the Monomer team and community.
+- [Monomer GitHub](https://github.com/polymerdao/monomer): Access the Monomer repository for the latest code and contributions.
+
+Monomer is a collaborative project between Nethermind and Polymer Labs:
 - [Nethermind X (Twitter)](https://x.com/NethermindEth): Follow for the latest news and insights from Nethermind.
 - [Polymer Labs X (Twitter)](https://x.com/Polymer_Labs): Follow for the latest news and insights from Polymer Labs.

This addition provides context for the separate Twitter accounts and includes a link to the GitHub repository for those interested in the code.

docs/docs/learn/blocks.md (2)

12-16: Approved changes with a minor suggestion.

The modifications in this section improve clarity and accuracy:

  1. The header level change enhances document structure.
  2. The spelling correction from "Supplimentary" to "Supplementary" is appropriate.
  3. The refined description of supplementary state storage provides more precise information.

Consider adding a brief explanation of what an "EVM sidecar state" is, as this term might not be familiar to all readers.


34-35: Approved changes with a suggestion for clarity.

The modifications in this section enhance the documentation's comprehensiveness:

  1. The expanded description of the block inspection process provides more detailed information about withdrawal transaction post-processing.
  2. The addition of information about Ethereum state proofs clarifies an important aspect of the L2 to L1 interaction.

To improve clarity, consider rephrasing the last sentence to explicitly connect the EVM sidecar state updates with the ability to provide Ethereum state proofs. For example:

"These updates to the EVM sidecar state enable Monomer to provide Ethereum state proofs back to L1 when proving that a withdrawal occurred on L2."

docs/docs/build/create-an-app-with-monomer.md (3)

10-21: Clarify setup process and add safety measures.

The instructions for creating a new Monomer application are clear, but there are a few points that could be improved:

  1. The use of rm -rf commands at the beginning of the script could be dangerous. Consider adding a warning about this or providing a safer alternative.
  2. The purpose of the setup-helper.sh script is not explained. It would be helpful to briefly describe what this script does.

Consider adding a note about the rm -rf commands and explaining the setup-helper.sh script. For example:

**Note:** This command will remove existing directories. Make sure you're in the correct location before running it.

The `setup-helper.sh` script is used to [brief explanation of what the script does].

24-29: Add language specification to the code block.

The configuration options are well-presented. However, the code block lacks a language specification.

Add a language specification to the code block for better syntax highlighting:

-```
+```text
 --address-prefix string   address prefix (default "cosmos")
 --app-dir-path string     project directory (default "./testapp")
 --gomod-path string       go module path (default "github.com/testapp/testapp")

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote>

26-26: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</blockquote></details>

</details>

---

`32-53`: **LGTM! Clear instructions with version-specific commands.**

The build and run instructions are well-structured and account for different Go versions. The emphasis on specifying the L1 wallet address is important.


Consider adding a note about the significance of the L1 wallet address. For example:

```markdown
**Note:** The L1 wallet address is crucial for [brief explanation of its importance in the context of Monomer].
docs/docs/learn/withdrawals.md (3)

17-17: Approve spelling correction and suggest hyphenation

The spelling correction from "modifiactions" to "modifications" improves the document's quality. Well done!

Consider hyphenating "Monomer-specific" for better readability:

-Again, this document focuses on Monomer specific modifications. Full documentation for the withdrawal flow is available in the [OP Stack specs](https://specs.optimism.io/protocol/withdrawals.html).
+Again, this document focuses on Monomer-specific modifications. Full documentation for the withdrawal flow is available in the [OP Stack specs](https://specs.optimism.io/protocol/withdrawals.html).
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~17-~17: When ‘Monomer-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...on L1. Again, this document focuses on Monomer specific modifications. Full documentation for t...

(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)


26-26: Approve clarity improvements and suggest additional context

The changes provide more clarity about the withdrawal process and the components involved. This is a good improvement to the documentation.

Consider adding a brief explanation or link for "Cosmos-SDK appchain" for readers who might be unfamiliar with the term. This could be done inline or as a footnote.


41-41: Approve clarity improvements and suggest minor rewording

The updates to this section provide more specific and clearer information about how Monomer integrates with the OP Stack withdrawal process. The explanation of the EVM sidecar state root's role is now more precise and informative.

Consider rewording the sentence slightly for even better clarity:

-For compatability with the withdrawals process, Monomer uses the state root of its EVM sidecar state as the L2 state updated by the `op-proposer`. Monomer exposes the standard ethereum `GetProof` API endpoint for obtaining a merkle proof of withdrawal transactions registered in the EVM sidecar state.
+For compatibility with the withdrawals process, Monomer uses the state root of its EVM sidecar as the L2 state updated by the `op-proposer`. Monomer exposes the standard Ethereum `GetProof` API endpoint for obtaining a Merkle proof of withdrawal transactions registered in the EVM sidecar state.

This change corrects the spelling of "compatibility", removes redundant use of "state", capitalizes "Ethereum" and "Merkle" as they are proper nouns.

docs/docs/build/interact.md (3)

18-31: Excellent addition of wallet configuration details.

This new section provides crucial information for users to set up their environment correctly. The warning about using testing-specific wallets is particularly important for user safety.

Consider this minor grammatical improvement in line 27:

-Alternative wallets can be configured for the L1 and L2 chains, however the network configurations will need to be added manually.
+Alternative wallets can be configured for the L1 and L2 chains; however, the network configurations will need to be added manually.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[typographical] ~27-~27: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...n be configured for the L1 and L2 chains, however the network configurations will need to...

(HOWEVER_SENTENCE)


43-45: Informative addition about L1 deposit transactions.

This new section provides valuable information about the deposit process using the OptimismPortal contract and the wallet integration server's interface.

Consider this minor punctuation improvement in line 44:

-A deposit transaction can be sent from L1 to L2 through the `OptimismPortal` contract on L1.
-The wallet integration server provides a simple interface for depositing ETH from L1 to L2 where the user specifies the amount of ETH to deposit and the recipient address of the user on L2 to send the funds to.
+A deposit transaction can be sent from L1 to L2 through the `OptimismPortal` contract on L1.
+The wallet integration server provides a simple interface for depositing ETH from L1 to L2, where the user specifies the amount of ETH to deposit and the recipient address of the user on L2 to send the funds to.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~44-~44: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...interface for depositing ETH from L1 to L2 where the user specifies the amount of ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


51-58: Excellent addition of querying information.

The new section on querying the rollup chain provides valuable information about using Cosmos SDK REST API endpoints. The example command for querying account balances is clear and helpful.

Consider adding a brief explanation of what the example command does, to enhance user understanding. For instance:

 For example, if a user wants to query the `bank` module for their account balance and is using the default API configuration, then they can use the following command:

 ```bash
 curl http://localhost:1317/cosmos/bank/v1beta1/balances/{address}

+This command retrieves the balance information for the specified address from the bank module.


</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>docs/docusaurus.config.ts (2)</summary><blockquote>

`65-76`: **LGTM: Improved navigation with 'Learn' and 'Build' sections**

The addition of 'Learn' and 'Build' navbar items enhances the documentation structure and improves user navigation. These new sections provide clear entry points for users to access different types of content.



Consider adding brief descriptions or tooltips for these new navbar items to give users a quick preview of what they can expect in each section. This can be done by adding a `title` attribute to each item. For example:

```typescript
{
  type: 'doc',
  docId: '/category/learn',
  position: 'left',
  label: 'Learn',
  title: 'Learn about Monomer concepts and architecture'
},
{
  type: 'doc',
  docId: '/category/build',
  position: 'left',
  label: 'Build',
  title: 'Start building applications with Monomer'
}

114-114: LGTM: Added syntax highlighting for bash and protobuf

The addition of syntax highlighting support for bash and protobuf is a great improvement. This will enhance the readability of code snippets in the documentation, particularly for command-line examples and data structure definitions.

Consider reviewing the documentation to ensure that all relevant code blocks are properly tagged with the correct language identifiers (e.g., bash or protobuf) to take full advantage of this new syntax highlighting. Additionally, if there are other commonly used languages in your documentation (e.g., JavaScript, Go, or Rust), you might want to add them to this list as well.

docs/docs/overview.md (4)

8-14: Minor language improvements suggested.

The content provides an excellent introduction to the context and benefits of Monomer. Consider the following minor language improvements:

  1. Line 10: Change "vertically-integrated" to "vertically integrated" (remove hyphen).
  2. Line 12: Change "widely-used" to "widely used" (remove hyphen).

These changes align with common style guides for adverbs ending in "-ly".

Would you like assistance in further clarifying any concepts in this section or expanding on the benefits of Monomer in this context?

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~10-~10: Although a hyphen is possible, it is not necessary in a compound modifier in which the first word is an adverb that ends in ‘ly’.
Context: ...lockchains enable developers to deliver vertically-integrated user experiences at lower costs. The C...

(HYPHENATED_LY_ADVERB_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~12-~12: The hyphen in widely-used is redundant.
Context: ...asily build their own. For example, the widely-used IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) mo...

(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)


16-37: Great explanation with helpful visuals. Minor grammar suggestion.

This section effectively explains the OP Stack architecture and Monomer's role in bridging OP Stack and Cosmos SDK applications. The inclusion of visual aids (images) for both the OP Stack and Cosmos SDK flows greatly enhances understanding.

Consider this minor grammatical improvement:

  • Line 21: Change "Many OP Stack rollups" to "Many OP Stack rollups," (add a comma) to improve readability.

The use of visual aids is particularly effective in this technical explanation. Great job on making the concepts more accessible!

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~21-~21: Possible agreement error. The noun OP seems to be uncountable; consider using: “much OP”, “a good deal of OP”.
Context: ...xecution layer is the interesting part. Many OP Stack rollups, such as Optimism and Bas...

(MANY_NN_U)


55-70: Comprehensive overview of Monomer's value proposition. Consider minor enhancement.

This section effectively highlights the key features and benefits of Monomer, emphasizing its role in extending Cosmos technology to a wider audience. The breakdown of features is clear and covers important aspects such as compatibility, customization, developer support, innovation, and VM support.

To enhance clarity further, consider:

  • Adding a brief introductory sentence before the bullet points to set the context, e.g., "Monomer offers several key advantages:"

The comprehensive list of features provides a strong case for why developers should be interested in Monomer. Great job on articulating the value proposition!


72-105: Comprehensive RPC compatibility table. Consider minor formatting enhancement.

The compatibility table provides a clear and detailed comparison of RPC endpoints supported by CometBFT and Monomer. This information is highly valuable for developers working with these systems.

To enhance readability, consider:

  • Adding alternating background colors to the rows in the table. This can make it easier for readers to track across long rows, especially in the middle of the table.

The comprehensive nature of this table is commendable. It offers developers a quick reference for understanding the capabilities and limitations of Monomer compared to CometBFT.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f604e0 and 3b02b90.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • docs/static/img/cosmos-abci.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • docs/static/img/favicon.ico is excluded by !**/*.ico
  • docs/static/img/op-stack.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • docs/yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • docs/docs/build/category.json (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/build/create-an-app-with-monomer.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/build/interact.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/intro.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/learn/category.json (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/learn/blocks.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/docs/learn/l2-mempool.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/learn/rollup-module.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/learn/withdrawals.md (3 hunks)
  • docs/docs/overview.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docusaurus.config.ts (4 hunks)
  • docs/package.json (1 hunks)
  • x/rollup/README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • docs/docs/build/category.json
  • docs/docs/learn/l2-mempool.md
  • docs/docs/learn/rollup-module.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/docs/build/create-an-app-with-monomer.md

26-26: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🪛 LanguageTool
docs/docs/build/interact.md

[typographical] ~27-~27: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...n be configured for the L1 and L2 chains, however the network configurations will need to...

(HOWEVER_SENTENCE)


[uncategorized] ~44-~44: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...interface for depositing ETH from L1 to L2 where the user specifies the amount of ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

docs/docs/intro.md

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...verview](./overview) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its arc...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

docs/docs/learn/withdrawals.md

[uncategorized] ~17-~17: When ‘Monomer-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...on L1. Again, this document focuses on Monomer specific modifications. Full documentation for t...

(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)

docs/docs/overview.md

[uncategorized] ~10-~10: Although a hyphen is possible, it is not necessary in a compound modifier in which the first word is an adverb that ends in ‘ly’.
Context: ...lockchains enable developers to deliver vertically-integrated user experiences at lower costs. The C...

(HYPHENATED_LY_ADVERB_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~12-~12: The hyphen in widely-used is redundant.
Context: ...asily build their own. For example, the widely-used IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) mo...

(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)


[grammar] ~21-~21: Possible agreement error. The noun OP seems to be uncountable; consider using: “much OP”, “a good deal of OP”.
Context: ...xecution layer is the interesting part. Many OP Stack rollups, such as Optimism and Bas...

(MANY_NN_U)


[style] ~44-~44: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...replaces the CometBFT consensus layer. In order to achieve this, Monomer performs three pr...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)

🔇 Additional comments (20)
docs/docs/learn/_category_.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Verify category order.

The change to update the "position" attribute from 2 to 3 looks good. This modification aligns with the overall goal of updating and restructuring the Monomer documentation.

To ensure consistency across the documentation structure, please verify that this change in position aligns with the intended order of documentation categories. You may want to check other _category_.json files to confirm the correct positioning of all categories.

This script will help you visualize the current order of all documentation categories.

x/rollup/README.md (1)

20-20: Excellent addition of specification link and clarification!

The inclusion of the link to the L1 attributes specification and the clarification about L1 attributes being stored in this module significantly enhances the documentation. This change provides valuable context for other L2 clients and aligns well with the PR's objective of updating and improving the Monomer documentation.

docs/docs/intro.md (2)

Line range hint 1-6: LGTM: Appropriate title change and frontmatter.

The change from "Overview" to "Introduction" better reflects the content of this document, providing a clear entry point for users new to Monomer.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...verview](./overview) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its arc...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


20-20: LGTM: Concise "Build" section.

This section effectively directs users to the tutorials for practical application of Monomer. It's clear and to the point.

docs/package.json (1)

24-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider the necessity and potential conflicts of adding PrismJS.

The addition of PrismJS (version ^1.25.0) as a direct dependency raises a few points to consider:

  1. Docusaurus already includes syntax highlighting capabilities through prism-react-renderer, which is listed as a dependency. Adding PrismJS directly might be redundant.

  2. If PrismJS is needed for additional functionality not provided by prism-react-renderer, it's worth documenting the specific use case in a comment or in the PR description.

  3. The version specified (^1.25.0) is quite old. The latest version of PrismJS is 1.29.0 as of my last update. Consider using a more recent version for better features and security updates.

  4. Ensure that this addition doesn't conflict with Docusaurus's built-in syntax highlighting or create unexpected behavior.

To check for potential conflicts or usage, you can run the following script:

If PrismJS is indeed necessary, consider updating to the latest version:

-    "prismjs": "^1.25.0",
+    "prismjs": "^1.29.0",

Also, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining why PrismJS is needed in addition to prism-react-renderer.

docs/docs/learn/blocks.md (2)

18-18: Approved header level change.

The modification of the "State Transition Function" header from # to ## improves the overall document structure and maintains consistency with the previous section.


Line range hint 1-35: Overall improvements align well with PR objectives.

The changes made to this document successfully achieve the following:

  1. Enhance the clarity and structure of the documentation.
  2. Provide more detailed and precise information about Monomer's block transition process.
  3. Correct spelling errors and improve the overall quality of the content.

These improvements align well with the PR objectives of updating Monomer documentation and incorporating information related to the monogen generation process. The enhanced clarity and comprehensiveness of the documentation will ensure that users have access to the latest and most accurate information regarding Monomer's functionality.

docs/docs/build/create-an-app-with-monomer.md (1)

Line range hint 1-8: LGTM! Clear and informative introduction.

The title and introduction effectively set the context for the document. The recommendation to read the Overview and Learn sections is particularly helpful for users new to Monomer.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

26-26: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

docs/docs/learn/withdrawals.md (3)

2-2: LGTM: Sidebar position update

The sidebar position has been updated, which will affect the document's order in the navigation. This change is straightforward and doesn't require further explanation.


30-30: Approve consistency improvements in event naming

The update to use consistent event naming conventions ("withdrawal_initiated" and "burn_eth") is a good improvement. This change enhances readability and aligns with common practices for event naming in many systems.


34-35: Approve clarity improvements in Monomer Block Builder section

The updates to this section provide more specific and clearer information about the Monomer block builder's role in the withdrawal process. The explanation of how withdrawal events are processed and stored in the EVM sidecar state is now more precise and informative.

docs/docs/build/interact.md (3)

11-11: Good addition of reference to e2e tests.

This note provides users with a valuable resource for finding the most up-to-date examples of working with the Monomer implementation.


33-39: Clear instructions for wallet setup.

The added instructions for starting the wallet integration server and guidance on adding wallets to MetaMask and Keplr are clear and helpful for users.


46-48: Clear update on L2 transaction submission.

The updated information about submitting L2 Cosmos SDK transactions using Keplr wallet or alternative Cosmos SDK wallets is clear and consistent with earlier information.

docs/docusaurus.config.ts (3)

42-42: LGTM: Correct update to the documentation path

The change from 'doc' to 'docs' in the editUrl property is correct and aligns with the standard naming convention for documentation folders. This update ensures that the "Edit this page" links will correctly point to the documentation files on GitHub.


104-104: LGTM: Updated Discord invite link

The Discord invite link has been updated, which is good practice to ensure it remains active and points to the correct server.

Please verify that the new Discord invite link (https://discord.gg/UR5ahaXwHH) is correct and leads to the intended Discord server. It's crucial to ensure that users can successfully join the community through this link.


Line range hint 1-120: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to documentation structure and accessibility

The changes made to the Docusaurus configuration file significantly enhance the documentation's structure and accessibility. Key improvements include:

  1. Corrected documentation path for edit links
  2. Enhanced navigation with new 'Learn' and 'Build' sections
  3. Updated Discord community link
  4. Improved code snippet readability with additional language support

These updates align well with the PR objectives of improving the Monomer documentation. The changes should provide a better user experience for developers interacting with the Monomer project documentation.

To further improve the documentation:

  1. Consider adding descriptive tooltips to the new navbar items.
  2. Ensure all code blocks in the documentation use the appropriate language tags.
  3. Verify the new Discord invite link.

Great work on enhancing the documentation structure!

docs/docs/overview.md (3)

1-7: LGTM: Document metadata and title are appropriate.

The metadata for this overview document is well-structured. The sidebar position (2) and slug ("/overview") are suitable for an overview page, likely making it easily accessible in the documentation structure.


39-53: Excellent architecture overview with clear explanation.

This section provides a concise and clear explanation of Monomer's architecture and its primary tasks. The inclusion of an architecture diagram (image) greatly enhances the understanding of how Monomer fits into the overall system.

The three primary tasks of Monomer are well-defined and cover the essential aspects of its functionality. This section effectively communicates the technical role of Monomer to the reader.

Great job on making complex architectural concepts accessible through clear explanations and visual representation!

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~44-~44: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...replaces the CometBFT consensus layer. In order to achieve this, Monomer performs three pr...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)


1-105: Excellent overview document with minor suggestions for improvement.

This overview document for Monomer is well-structured, informative, and effectively communicates the project's purpose, architecture, and benefits. The use of visual aids (diagrams and tables) significantly enhances understanding of complex concepts.

Summary of suggestions for improvement:

  1. Remove hyphens from "vertically-integrated" and "widely-used" (lines 10 and 12).
  2. Add a comma after "Many OP Stack rollups" (line 21).
  3. Consider adding a brief introductory sentence before the bullet points in the "Why Monomer Matters" section.
  4. Consider adding alternating background colors to the rows in the RPC compatibility table for improved readability.

These minor adjustments will further enhance the already high-quality document.

Great job on creating a comprehensive and accessible overview of the Monomer project!

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~10-~10: Although a hyphen is possible, it is not necessary in a compound modifier in which the first word is an adverb that ends in ‘ly’.
Context: ...lockchains enable developers to deliver vertically-integrated user experiences at lower costs. The C...

(HYPHENATED_LY_ADVERB_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~12-~12: The hyphen in widely-used is redundant.
Context: ...asily build their own. For example, the widely-used IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) mo...

(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)


[grammar] ~21-~21: Possible agreement error. The noun OP seems to be uncountable; consider using: “much OP”, “a good deal of OP”.
Context: ...xecution layer is the interesting part. Many OP Stack rollups, such as Optimism and Bas...

(MANY_NN_U)


[style] ~44-~44: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...replaces the CometBFT consensus layer. In order to achieve this, Monomer performs three pr...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)


Congratulations! You've successfully integrated Monomer into your Cosmos SDK
application.
Congratulations! You've successfully integrated Monomer into your Cosmos SDK application.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update conclusion to reflect Monomer focus.

The conclusion congratulates the reader, which is great. However, it mentions integrating Monomer into a Cosmos SDK application, which is inconsistent with the rest of the document that focuses on creating a Monomer application.

Consider updating the conclusion to:

Congratulations! You've successfully created and started a new Monomer application.

Comment on lines 3 to 6
sidebar_position: 3
---

# Interact with a Monomer Rollup Chain (stub)
# Interact with a Monomer Rollup Chain
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Sidebar position conflict detected.

The interact.md file has a sidebar_position of 3, which is also assigned to withdrawals.md. Please ensure that sidebar positions are unique to maintain a clear navigation order.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Verify sidebar positioning.

The removal of "(stub)" from the title indicates that this document is now more complete. The sidebar position change is noted.

Please verify that the new sidebar position (3) is correct in the context of the overall documentation structure. Run the following script to check the sidebar positions of related documents:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check sidebar positions of related documents

# Test: List all Markdown files in the docs directory with their sidebar positions
fd -e md . docs | xargs grep -H "sidebar_position:" | sort -t':' -k3 -n

Length of output: 512

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b02b90 and 92759b2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • monogen/testapp.zip is excluded by !**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • monogen/testapp/wallet/index.html (1 hunks)
  • opdevnet/wallet/index.html (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • opdevnet/wallet/index.html
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
monogen/testapp/wallet/index.html (1)

1-10: LGTM: HTML structure and meta tags are well-formed.

The HTML structure follows best practices with proper doctype, language specification, meta tags, and title. The inclusion of Google Fonts for consistent typography is a good choice.

Comment on lines +11 to +85
<style>
body {
font-family: "Roboto", sans-serif;
background-color: #f4f4f9;
margin: 0;
padding: 50px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}

div {
text-align: center;
padding: 40px;
border-radius: 10px;
box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
margin: 20px;
}

.container {
background-color: ghostwhite;
}

.section {
background-color: white;
}

ul {
text-align: left;
padding-left: 40px;
margin: 0 auto 20px auto;
max-width: 750px;
}

h1 {
font-size: 2rem;
color: #333;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}

button {
background-color: #007bff;
color: white;
border: none;
padding: 12px 24px;
border-radius: 5px;
font-size: 1rem;
cursor: pointer;
transition: background-color 0.3s ease;
margin: 10px 0;
}

button:hover {
background-color: #0056b3;
}

input {
width: 100%;
max-width: 300px;
padding: 12px 20px;
display: block;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
border-radius: 5px;
box-sizing: border-box;
font-size: 1rem;
transition: border-color 0.3s ease;
margin: 10px auto 20px;
}

input:focus {
border-color: #007bff;
outline: none;
}
</style>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider moving styles to a separate CSS file.

The current CSS provides a clean and responsive design. However, for better maintainability and separation of concerns, especially as the application grows, consider moving these styles to a separate CSS file.

This approach would:

  1. Improve code organization
  2. Enable browser caching of CSS
  3. Make it easier to apply styles across multiple pages

You can create a new file styles.css in the same directory and link it in the HTML head:

<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css">

Then move all the content within the <style> tags to this new file.

Comment on lines +86 to +89
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/ethers.umd.min.js"></script>
<script src="bech32.js"></script>
<script src="metamask-integration.js?v=1.0" defer></script>
<script src="keplr-integration.js?v=1.0" defer></script>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize script loading and versioning.

The inclusion of necessary scripts is good, but there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider using the async or defer attributes for all scripts to optimize page loading.
  2. Instead of using query parameters for versioning (e.g., ?v=1.0), consider using file hashes or a build process to generate unique filenames. This ensures proper cache busting when the files are updated.
  3. For production, consider bundling and minifying your scripts to reduce HTTP requests and file size.

Example of improved script tags:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/ethers.umd.min.js" defer></script>
<script src="bech32.js" defer></script>
<script src="metamask-integration.js" defer></script>
<script src="keplr-integration.js" defer></script>

Then use a build process to generate versioned filenames or add integrity hashes for better caching and security.

Comment on lines 92 to 149
<div class="container">
<h1>Monomer L1 Wallet Integration</h1>
<p>Connected account: <span id="account">Not connected</span></p>
<div class="section">
<h2>Metamask Integration</h2>
<p>
Before adding the Monomer L1 Devnet to your Metamask wallet,
please ensure that you perform the following steps:
</p>
<ul>
<li>
Ensure that you use a separate test wallet for the
Monomer L1 Devnet.
</li>
<li>
If the Monomer L1 Devnet wallet was previously
configured, click the "Clear activity and nonce data"
button in the Metamask "Advanced" settings and remove
the network from Metamask in the "Networks" tab. Then,
you can re-add the network.
</li>
<li>
Run the Monomer appchain with the flags to start the L1
devnet and OP Stack:
<ul>
<li>
<code
>./{AppName}d monomer start
--minimum-gas-prices 0.01wei --api.enable
--monomer.dev-start
--monomer.dev.l1-user-address
"0x{YourL1WalletAddress}"</code
>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<button id="enable-metamask">Add L1 Chain to Metamask</button>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2>L1 to L2 ETH Deposits</h2>
<p>
Deposit ETH from L1 to L2 by entering the deposit amount and
the Keplr recipient address below.
</p>
<br />

<label for="amount"><b>ETH Deposit Amount</b></label>
<input type="number" id="amount" name="amount" />
<label for="recipient"
><b>Cosmos L2 Recipient Address</b></label
>
<input type="text" id="recipient" name="recipient" />

<button id="deposit-button">Deposit ETH on L2</button>
</div>
<p id="status"></p>
</div>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance L1 wallet integration section for better UX and security.

The L1 wallet integration section is well-structured, but consider the following improvements:

  1. Add input validation for the deposit amount and recipient address to prevent errors.
  2. Include a confirmation step before executing the deposit to prevent accidental transactions.
  3. Consider adding a loading indicator for the deposit process.
  4. Provide more detailed error handling and user feedback.
  5. Add a warning about the risks of using test networks and handling crypto assets.

Here's an example of how you could implement some of these suggestions:

<div class="section">
    <h2>L1 to L2 ETH Deposits</h2>
    <p>Deposit ETH from L1 to L2 by entering the deposit amount and the Keplr recipient address below.</p>
    <p class="warning">Warning: This is a test network. Only use test funds and addresses.</p>

    <label for="amount"><b>ETH Deposit Amount</b></label>
    <input type="number" id="amount" name="amount" min="0" step="0.000001" required />
    
    <label for="recipient"><b>Cosmos L2 Recipient Address</b></label>
    <input type="text" id="recipient" name="recipient" pattern="^cosmos1[a-zA-Z0-9]{38}$" required />

    <button id="confirm-deposit">Confirm Deposit</button>
    <div id="confirmation-modal" style="display: none;">
        <p>Are you sure you want to deposit <span id="confirm-amount"></span> ETH to <span id="confirm-recipient"></span>?</p>
        <button id="execute-deposit">Yes, Deposit</button>
        <button id="cancel-deposit">Cancel</button>
    </div>

    <div id="loading-indicator" style="display: none;">Processing deposit...</div>
</div>
<p id="status"></p>

Remember to update your JavaScript to handle these new elements and provide appropriate feedback to the user.

Comment on lines +150 to +165
<div class="container">
<h1>Monomer L2 Wallet Integration</h1>
<div class="section">
<h2>Keplr Integration</h2>
<p>
Before adding the Monomer L2 to your Keplr wallet, please
remove the chain from your wallet if it was previously
added. After adding the Monomer L2 chain config to Keplr,
you can make the chain visible in your wallet by navigating
to the "General" settings and adding the chain through the
"Add/Remove Non-Native Chains" page.
</p>
<button id="enable-keplr">Add L2 Chain to Keplr</button>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance L2 wallet integration section with more detailed instructions.

The L2 wallet integration section provides basic information, but it could be improved to offer a better user experience:

  1. Provide step-by-step instructions for removing a previously added chain from Keplr.
  2. Add more details about the Monomer L2 chain configuration (e.g., chain ID, RPC URL) for transparency.
  3. Include a troubleshooting section or FAQ for common issues users might encounter.
  4. Add a success message or indicator after the chain is successfully added to Keplr.

Here's an example of how you could enhance this section:

<div class="container">
    <h1>Monomer L2 Wallet Integration</h1>
    <div class="section">
        <h2>Keplr Integration</h2>
        <p>Follow these steps to add the Monomer L2 chain to your Keplr wallet:</p>
        <ol>
            <li>If previously added, remove the Monomer L2 chain:
                <ul>
                    <li>Open Keplr extension</li>
                    <li>Go to Settings > Manage Chain Visibility</li>
                    <li>Find Monomer L2 and click "Remove"</li>
                </ul>
            </li>
            <li>Click the "Add L2 Chain to Keplr" button below</li>
            <li>Review the chain information in the Keplr popup</li>
            <li>Click "Approve" to add the chain</li>
            <li>Navigate to Keplr's "General" settings</li>
            <li>Add the chain through the "Add/Remove Non-Native Chains" page</li>
        </ol>
        <button id="enable-keplr">Add L2 Chain to Keplr</button>
        <p id="keplr-status"></p>
    </div>
    <div class="section">
        <h2>Troubleshooting</h2>
        <ul>
            <li>If the chain doesn't appear, try refreshing the page and adding again.</li>
            <li>Ensure you're using the latest version of Keplr.</li>
            <li>If issues persist, clear your browser cache and try again.</li>
        </ul>
    </div>
</div>

Remember to update your JavaScript to handle the status message and provide appropriate feedback to the user.

@natebeauregard natebeauregard merged commit f959116 into main Oct 18, 2024
15 checks passed
@natebeauregard natebeauregard deleted the nkb.update-docs branch October 18, 2024 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants