Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Image Display and Documentation Links #313

Closed

Conversation

savvar9991
Copy link

@savvar9991 savvar9991 commented Dec 9, 2024

The images in the file were not displayed. Fixed. The correct links were found and now everything works correctly
Some links to the documentation were not working .Fixed, now all links are working

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated links in the introduction document for improved accessibility.
    • Refined the deployment section in the overview document for clarity on Cosmos SDK applications on the OP Stack.
    • Enhanced the "Architecture at a Glance" section with detailed descriptions of Monomer's functionality.
    • Updated the RPC compatibility table to reflect endpoint support between CometBFT and Monomer.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request updates documentation files to improve link accessibility and enhance clarity regarding the deployment of Cosmos SDK applications on the OP Stack. The intro.md file has had its links changed from relative paths to absolute URLs, while the overview.md file has undergone modifications to image paths and content to better explain the roles of various components and the compatibility of RPC endpoints.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/docs/intro.md Updated links to "Overview," "Learn," and "Build" sections from relative paths to absolute URLs.
docs/docs/overview.md Modified image paths, clarified deployment roles of consensus and execution layers, expanded Monomer functionality description, and updated RPC compatibility table.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • NiloCK
  • joshklop
  • natebeauregard

🐰 In the realm of code, we hop with glee,
Links now lead where they ought to be!
From paths that twist to URLs bright,
Our docs shine clearer, a joyful sight!
With images placed in their rightful home,
Knowledge now spreads, no need to roam! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@savvar9991 savvar9991 changed the title Fix/correct text and links Fix Image Display and Documentation Links Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/docs/intro.md (1)

16-16: Add hyphen to compound adjective

Change "high level" to "high-level" since it's being used as a compound adjective modifying "overview".

-The [Overview](./overview.md) section provides a high level overview of Monomer
+The [Overview](./overview.md) section provides a high-level overview of Monomer
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...view](./overview.md) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its arc...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0cb9bc3 and 0de31bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/docs/intro.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/overview.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/docs/intro.md

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...view](./overview.md) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its arc...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/docs/intro.md (1)

16-20: Verify relative link path

The link to the overview section uses a relative path ./overview.md. While this works, consider using just overview since you're using docusaurus which handles the .md extension automatically.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...view](./overview.md) section provides a high level overview of Monomer, explaining its arc...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

docs/docs/overview.md (2)

105-105: LGTM: Table entry maintains consistency

The added table entry for /unsubscribe_all (Websocket) maintains consistent formatting with other entries and includes the correct link.


26-26: Verify image paths and files

The image paths have been updated to use /docs/static/img/. Let's verify these images exist in the correct location.

Also applies to: 33-33, 52-52

✅ Verification successful

Image paths are correctly configured

All referenced images (op-stack.png, cosmos-abci.png, and architecture.png) exist in the expected location at docs/static/img/. The path changes are valid and the images are properly placed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if all referenced images exist
for img in "op-stack.png" "cosmos-abci.png" "architecture.png"; do
    test -f "docs/static/img/$img" && echo "$img exists" || echo "$img not found"
done

Length of output: 479

@joshklop joshklop closed this Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants