Added paragraph in the documentation for HVDC lines #1070
Conversation
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
SylvestreSakti
changed the title
|
A paragraph should probably be added to explain the bounds of active power transit in the HVDC line, and the formula for the line losses. |
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
SylvestreSakti
changed the title
docs/loadflow/loadflow.md
Outdated
| - $P_{controller} = P_0 + k~(\theta_1 - \theta_2)$ | ||
| - $P_{noncontroller} = (1 - loss_{noncontroller}) * ((1 - loss_{controller}) * (P_0 + k~(\theta_1 - \theta_2) - P_{LineLoss}))$ | ||
|
|
||
| In both regulation modes, the power transits are impacted by losses of the converter stations. In addition, Joule effect (due to resistance in cable) implies line loss in the HVDC line. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
regulation -> maybe better control ?
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
|
Thank you for your review, I agree with all your precisions and modified the doc. |
|
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
|
|
||
| - In **AC emulation** mode, the active power flow between both stations is given by: $P = P_0 + k~(\theta_1 - \theta_2)$ | ||
| with $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ being the voltage angles at the bus connection for each converter station, and $P_0$ and $k$ being fixed parameters for the HVDC line. | ||
| If $P$ is positive, the converter station 1 is controller, else it is converter station 2. For example, if station 1 is controller, the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@SylvestreSakti I have changed the sentence because I think it was wrong. Maybe just check my rewording "If
active power flow at each station is given by:..."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you Anne, indeed it was wrong, I should have named the angles theta_{controller} and theta_{noncontroller} but I think your rewording seems more clear.
SylvestreSakti
changed the title
…tion for HVDC Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
SylvestreSakti
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <[email protected]>
|
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Documentation on HVDC and VSC converters. Maybe these paragraph are not located in the right place in the documentation, feel free to move them at the right place.
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information: