-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Current limit violations detection in DC security analysis #549
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Hadrien <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hadrien <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hadrien <[email protected]>
6707e39
to
00248c2
Compare
Signed-off-by: Hadrien <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
@@ -91,6 +93,8 @@ public class OpenLoadFlowParameters extends AbstractExtension<LoadFlowParameters | |||
|
|||
public static final String TRANSFORMER_VOLTAGE_CONTROL_MODE_NAME = "transformerVoltageControlMode"; | |||
|
|||
public static final String DC_COS_PHI_NAME = "dcCosPhi"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@annetill are you sure cos(phi) is the right naming? phi is used in OLF as the voltage angle. Would power factor more usual way of naming this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes right, my mistake, I am going to fix the name.
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <[email protected]>
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'
to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'
and skip the restWhat kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
This PR introduces the handling of current limit violations in the DC security analysis.
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)