-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support preCICE Waveform API #146
Conversation
Everything except the spack tests are working here. (I currently do not have the time to look deeper into spack) I will now also create a breaking PR for the 3.0.0 release of preCICE. |
Can we sync this with the latest develop to ensure that when we plan to merge this we would not have excessive conflicts? |
Done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 👍 just a minor suggestion in the if statement to check if a relative time is provided or not.
Co-authored-by: Ishaan Desai <[email protected]>
@IshaanDesai Thanks for the review and the suggestion! I would suggest to merge this PR as soon as precice/precice#1366 is merged, because this PR is also a breaking one and relies on |
Co-authored-by: Ishaan Desai <[email protected]>
This is not necessarily breaking, because the waveform API was already introduced in preCICE v2.4.0.