Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix parallel builds for agbcc, remove configure artifacts from gcc_arm, attempt to fix travis build, add github workflows CI file #36

Closed
wants to merge 40 commits into from

Conversation

Missingmew
Copy link

@Missingmew Missingmew commented Dec 1, 2020

See title.
Parallel builds for agbcc are fixed by adding genrtl.h to the rule that builds the generator executable objects (since all of them depend on it), which in turn fixes parallel builds for the entire thing.
Current master has artifacts from configure in gcc_arm which dont need to be kept, since configure as called from build.sh generates those just fine. Additionally this switches from selectively deleting two artifacts to just make distclean.
Travis fails because of not finding zlib-dev. According to ubuntu package repos, the package should be called zlib1g-dev so this should theoretically fix travis (changes taken from #31 to get travis to work).
Additionally, this PR now includes a github workflows CI config file to potentially drop travis in the future due to their changes in usage for free users.
Changes from #37 have been incorporated, the github workflows file has been modified to build both with and without devkitARM.

they get generated just fine by configure
…l.sh to work with the same environment the makefile uses
@Missingmew Missingmew changed the title Fix parallel builds for agbcc, remove configure artifacts from gcc_arm, attempt to fix travis build Fix parallel builds for agbcc, remove configure artifacts from gcc_arm, attempt to fix travis build, add github workflows CI file Dec 12, 2020
@rawr51919
Copy link

Looks interesting! Mind if this is rebased so you fix your merge conflicts first?

@Missingmew
Copy link
Author

Conflicts should be gone now, feel free to do as you like.
Better 1.5 years later than never.

@rawr51919
Copy link

@Missingmew all the relevant points and more from this PR have been separated into individual PRs each. Please close this PR.

@Missingmew
Copy link
Author

Closing as requested by @coltongit

@Missingmew Missingmew closed this Jun 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants