-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JOSS Review warning about out of date local data #59
Comments
The package will, by default, load the latest version of the database that is available on your computer (e.g., because you previously downloaded the data). This warning message is telling you that this version is now out of date, and a newer version is available online. I guess you would need to worry about this warning if you are running analyses that require the latest version, but generally this isn't the case. Sure, I can add some info to the docs on this message. |
Sorry for the slow progress on this @DrMattG. Just to keep you in the loop, I'm planning on creating a PR to incorperate this feedback - once I've merged the PR to address the issues raised by @Jo-Schie. Since I'm really bad at dealing with merge conflicts, I'd rather not create multiple branches at the same time and then have to juggle conflicts when merging them. Did you have any other issues/concerns (apart from #58 and #59) as part of your review? Or will I have addressed all your major concerns once these are addressed? Thanks for your patience! |
Hi @jeffreyhanson - That's fine - I think I am happy with everything else - I understand the merge conflict issue! |
Ok awesome - thank you! |
Woops, forgot tag this issue in the commit when merging this PR, so I'll close this manually. |
Warning message:
In wdpa_fetch("Norway", wait = TRUE, download_dir = rappdirs::user_data_dir("wdpar")) :
local data is out of date: jul 2022
(
wdpar/R/wdpa_fetch.R
Line 183 in 40e8e79
What does it mean if the local data is out of date? Do I need to worry about this warning? It would be good to have some comment on this in the documentation (or somewhere).
openjournals/joss-reviews#4594
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: