Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update continuous integration environment #563

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2025
Merged

Update continuous integration environment #563

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Feb 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a unified automation pipeline that now handles code formatting, type checking, dependency validation, unit tests, and performance benchmarks across multiple environments.
  • Chores
    • Removed legacy and redundant workflows to streamline the build and test process, ensuring faster and more reliable releases.
    • Updated README to reflect the new pipeline status badge.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request removes multiple GitHub Actions workflows and introduces a new unified pipeline. Removed workflows included those for running benchmarks, code formatting (Black), unit tests (including various configurations such as minimal, MPI, Flux, Windows, and legacy), static type checks (MyPy), pip dependency checks, and notebook testing. The new pipeline consolidates all these CI/CD tasks into one workflow triggered on pushes to the main branch and pull requests, streamlining the automated testing, code quality, and deployment process without altering public interfaces.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/black.yml, .github/workflows/format_black.yml Removed workflows for checking and auto-applying code formatting using Black.
.github/workflows/benchmark.yml, .github/workflows/minimal.yml, .github/workflows/unittests-old.yml,
.github/workflows/unittest-mpich.yml, .github/workflows/unittest-openmpi.yml, .github/workflows/unittest-win.yml, .github/workflows/unittest-flux-mpich.yml, .github/workflows/unittest-flux-openmpi.yml
Removed workflows for running benchmarks and unit tests across diverse environments (including MPI, Flux, Windows, and legacy configurations).
.github/workflows/mypy.yml, .github/workflows/pypicheck.yml Removed workflows for static type checking (MyPy) and pip dependency verification.
.github/workflows/notebooks.yml Removed workflow for setting up the environment and testing Jupyter notebooks.
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml Added a new unified CI/CD pipeline workflow that consolidates formatting, type checking, unit testing, benchmarking, notebook testing, and an auto-merge job.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/PR Event
    participant C as CI Pipeline
    U->>C: Trigger pipeline (push/PR)
    C->>C: Run Black check
    alt Formatting fails
      C->>C: Run Black fix
    end
    C->>C: Run MyPy check
    C->>C: Run Minimal unit tests
    C->>C: Run Pip dependency check
    C->>C: Run Benchmark tests
    C->>C: Run Notebook tests
    C->>C: Run extended unit tests (MPI, Flux, Windows, Legacy)
    C->>C: Trigger Autobot for PR auto-merge
    C-->>U: Report results
Loading

Poem

I’m a rabbit hopping through code so light,
Seeing workflows vanish, oh what a sight!
A unified pipeline now leads the way,
Testing and formatting all day by day.
Hop along, dear devs, in bright code delight!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22e104c and e0f16e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (14)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (2)

143-171: Adjust YAML indentation in the notebooks job steps.
A static analysis warning indicates an indentation issue on line 147 — the list item is indented with 6 spaces rather than the expected 4 spaces.

Proposed modification:

-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+    - uses: actions/checkout@v4

Ensure consistency across the other steps in this block as well.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 147-147: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


371-383: Adjust YAML indentation and end-of-file formatting in the autobot job.
There are two points to address in this section:

  1. Line 379 has an indentation issue—the list item is indented with 6 spaces instead of the expected 4 spaces.

Proposed diff:

-      - name: Enable auto-merge for bot PRs
+    - name: Enable auto-merge for bot PRs
  1. Line 383 is missing a newline at the end of the file.

Please add a newline at the end to comply with best practices.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 379-379: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


[error] 383-383: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7756be and 22e104c.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • .github/workflows/benchmark.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/black.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/format_black.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/minimal.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/mypy.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/notebooks.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pypicheck.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittest-flux-mpich.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittest-flux-openmpi.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittest-mpich.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittest-openmpi.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittest-win.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittests-old.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (13)
  • .github/workflows/black.yml
  • .github/workflows/mypy.yml
  • .github/workflows/unittests-old.yml
  • .github/workflows/unittest-win.yml
  • .github/workflows/format_black.yml
  • .github/workflows/benchmark.yml
  • .github/workflows/unittest-openmpi.yml
  • .github/workflows/pypicheck.yml
  • .github/workflows/minimal.yml
  • .github/workflows/notebooks.yml
  • .github/workflows/unittest-flux-openmpi.yml
  • .github/workflows/unittest-flux-mpich.yml
  • .github/workflows/unittest-mpich.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml

[warning] 48-48: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


[warning] 147-147: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


[warning] 379-379: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


[error] 383-383: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (13)

1-2: Pipeline name and trigger definition are clear.
The workflow’s name ("Pipeline") and trigger configuration (push to main and pull_request events) are defined correctly.


3-7: CI trigger configuration looks appropriate.
The push and pull_request triggers are set up as expected to cover relevant events for continuous integration.


8-17: Job "black" configuration is correctly structured.
The job uses a recent checkout action and the stable psf/black action with check mode and diff options; this matches the objective of enforcing code style.


18-43: Job "black_fix" is implemented to auto-format code on failure.
The use of "needs: [black]" and checking out the head branch correctly addresses the scenario when formatting is required.


60-81: Job "minimal" is set up properly.
The configuration of the minimal Conda environment and execution of unit tests appears complete and matches the intended pipeline functionality.


82-101: Job "pip_check" is configured correctly.
The steps install dependencies and run pip check as expected.


102-142: Job "benchmark" is well configured.
The matrix strategy across operating systems and environment files is set appropriately to run various benchmark scripts.


172-202: Job "unittest_flux_mpich" is configured appropriately.
The steps for extending the environment and executing tests are clear and align with the new CI structure.


203-238: Job "unittest_flux_openmpi" is set up correctly.
The configuration and test execution commands appear correct and consistent with the pipeline objectives.


240-280: Job "unittest_mpich" is implemented well.
The matrix strategy across different operating systems and Python versions is comprehensive.


281-321: Job "unittest_openmpi" configuration is thorough.
The test setup uses the appropriate setup action and environment file along with a proper matrix configuration.


322-344: Job "unittest_win" configuration is accurate for Windows testing.
The steps for setting up the Conda environment and running unit tests on Windows are correctly defined.


345-370: Job "unittest_old" correctly maintains backward compatibility testing.
The environment variables and test steps ensure that legacy configurations are validated.

Comment on lines +47 to +48
steps:
- name: Setup Python
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Correct YAML indentation in the mypy job.
Static analysis indicates that the list item under "steps:" in the mypy job is indented with 6 spaces while 4 spaces are expected.

Suggested change:

-      - name: Setup Python
+    - name: Setup Python

Please review and adjust the indentation for all items in this block consistently.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
steps:
- name: Setup Python
steps:
- name: Setup Python
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 48-48: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit f7de7f7 into main Feb 9, 2025
30 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the ci branch February 9, 2025 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant