Add docs FAQ entry on domain name distinctions (pylint dot org vs pylint.readthedocs.io)

[d33bs]

Type of Changes

	Type
✓	📜 Docs

Description

This PR adds an FAQ entry to the docs which helps clarify that pylint dot org is managed outside of this project and that this project is associated with the documentation found at pylint.readthedocs.io . I tried to tie this to the PyPI package in the language within the FAQ entry, as I'm unsure if pylint dot org manages its own distributions somehow, but let me know if there's a better way to state this clearly!

Thank you in advance for any thoughts or feedback!

Closes #8934 (please let me know if you feel this should close the issue instead of ref'ing it!)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.83%. Comparing base (d94194b) to head (6879eb6).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #10177   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.83%   95.83%           
=======================================
  Files         174      174           
  Lines       19002    19002           
=======================================
  Hits        18211    18211           
  Misses        791      791           

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Thank you for opening the PR ! Let me know what you think of my suggestion. If we use the actual domain name in discussion and not pylint dot org, it helps them with better SEO :)

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Suggested change

	What is the difference between pylint.org and pylint.readthedocs.io?
	What's the matter with pylint dot org ?

[d33bs]

Thanks for this suggestion! I might try a different approach here to avoid making it seem like pylint dot org is somehow "wrong" or "lesser than" ("what's the matter" is commonly used to indicate there might be a perceived problem) in the spirit of doing no harm.

[d33bs]

Changed this to a more neutral How does the website pylint dot org relate to this project?.

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Ho, it's inferior, it's some domain name scalper making banks on the project popularity without doing any work and using outdated doc.

[d33bs]

I see, I didn't understand that from the issue context; I thought it might have been the original author's company simply allowing for decayed content to persist (maybe out of lack of knowledge or awareness). I'll give another edit a whirl.

[d33bs]

Thank you @Pierre-Sassoulas for the review! I made some changes based on your feedback, including shifting all language in the PR to avoid the use of the full domain name for pylint dot org.

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Thank you for making the doc better @d33bs !

[d33bs]

Thank you @Pierre-Sassoulas for merging this in! Hope it helps regarding the potential for confusion.