-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[coverage] Invoke pytest as python -m pytest
to restore coverage
#8902
[coverage] Invoke pytest as python -m pytest
to restore coverage
#8902
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8902 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 30.05% 95.74% +65.68%
===========================================
Files 64 173 +109
Lines 5017 18570 +13553
===========================================
+ Hits 1508 17780 +16272
+ Misses 3509 790 -2719 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
pytest really wants to invoke tests against the local copy, see https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/explanation/goodpractices.html
python -m pytest
to restore coverage
Maybe this is giving back some of the benefits of #8878, but pytest really seems to want to execute tests against the local copy, and I don't have time to commit to a bigger refactor. Part of what makes this more difficult is that we don't use a |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
🤖 According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 This comment was generated for commit 1a4cbcd |
Follow-up to #8878. Ideally this will restore the codecov calculations.