-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mark expose nontransfered marks via pytestmark property #2517
Merged
nicoddemus
merged 8 commits into
pytest-dev:features
from
RonnyPfannschmidt:mark-expose-nontransfered
Jun 23, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bdec2c8
move marker transfer to _pytest.mark
RonnyPfannschmidt 64ae6ae
extract application of marks and legacy markinfos
RonnyPfannschmidt 19b12b2
store pristine marks on function.pytestmark
RonnyPfannschmidt c791895
changelog addition
RonnyPfannschmidt 1d92601
add deprecation warnings for using markinfo attributes
RonnyPfannschmidt 23d016f
address review comments
RonnyPfannschmidt b0b6c35
fixup changelog, thanks Bruno
RonnyPfannschmidt 8d5f287
minor code style fix
RonnyPfannschmidt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Now test function objects have a ``pytestmark`` attribute containing a list of marks applied directly to the test function, as opposed to marks inherited from parent classes or modules. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion to improve readability here:
istestfunc(func)
to ais_test_func
local variableassert is_test_func
as the first line of theelse
statement;I find a good practice to always assert for a known condition in a
else
statement when the condition is not really obvious. This is more apparent when checking multiple possible paths: